|
|
Issue 2, December 2003
COMMENTARY
The Spirit and the Opportunity: Episodes of Science at its Best
Selby Cull, Senior Research Editor, Science Journalist
Planetary Sciences, Hampshire College
cull@jyi.org
Discuss this article!
 |
| Emanuel Swedenborg, the Swedish
scholar who mastered every facet of science he could lay his
hands on. His vacuum pump would lead to incredible discoveries
centuries later. Source: Swedenborg Foundation. |
One
does not become a biochemist overnight, or a physicist, or an engineer,
or a great inventor.
Today,
the fields of science are vast, complicated, and so painfully detailed
that it might take an entire lifetime of study and devotion to master
even one.
There
was a time, though — hundreds of years ago, in a world with
less data — when a gifted and spirited individual had the
opportunity to master many facets of science. Such a thing was never
easy, and it required talent, dedication, and the spirit of a true
lover of science. Such a spirit can make monumental discoveries
— or small ones that grow monumental with time. Emanuel Swedenborg
had such a spirit, and just such an opportunity.
The Last of the Universal Scholars
In
18th-century Europe, a world innocent to the existence of the atom
and only barely touched by Newton’s laws, Emanuel Swedenborg
mastered every field of science he could lay his hands on: chemistry,
engineering, physics, mathematics, mineralogy, geology, paleontology,
anatomy, astronomy, metallurgy, cosmology, cosmogony, psychology.
In war-torn Sweden, he founded the science of crystallography, localized
brain functions 100 years ahead of anatomists, and developed a theory
of the formation of the sun and the planets that would take hundreds
of years to verify.
Swedenborg was
also a spirited inventor, designing machines far ahead of his time.
He designed a one-manned submarine, a crude calculator, the lock
for raising ships, the jack (now used for raising cars), a new crane,
a new air gun, a traction machine, an airtight hot air stove, drawbridges,
an ear trumpet for those with deafness, and a machine for raising
ore out of mines, to name a few.
One of Swedenborg’s
least-recognized designs turned out to have a stunning effect a
century later: a new type of vacuum pump. Since the invention of
the vacuum pump by Otto von Guericke in 1654, vacuum technology
had progressed slowly. The pumps did not produce much of a vacuum,
a fact that did not escape Swedenborg. Combining Evangelista Torricelli’s
mercury work of nearly a century before with von Guericke’s
pump, Swedenborg designed an entirely new type of machine: a mercury
vacuum pump.
By
replacing von Guericke’s piston with a tube of mercury and
alternately increasing and decreasing the volume of the mercury,
Swedenborg had designed a vacuum pump that created an excellent
vacuum. However, the design, published in 1722, caused little stir.
The Glassblower and the Physicist
Vacuum technology
continued to progress slowly through the late 1700s and early 1800s,
lacking any opportunity to advance. Then, in 1855, a German glassblower
and instrument designer took an interest in Swedenborg’s mercury
design. Heinrich Geissler, who preferred building over drawing designs,
stumbled upon Swedenborg’s pump design and modified it by
connecting the mercury reservoir to a glass bulb via a flexible
tube. By attaching a two-way valve to the bulb and alternately raising
and lowering the mercury, Geissler created the best vacuum yet invented.
Although a near-vacuum
might have been mildly interesting to a glassblower, to a physicist
it was a monumental opportunity. Hearing of the invention, the German
physicist Johann Hittorf immediately purchased Geissler’s
mercury pump for his experiments with electricity.
Hittorf hooked
Geissler’s pump up to a primitive Crooke’s tube, a glass
tube with two metal plates inside, one connected to the positive
side of an electricity supply and one to the negative side. When
Faraday had tried this experiment 40 years before with a weak vacuum
pump, he had found a small dark space near the negative plate as
electric discharges flashed across the tube. Now, in 1869, Hittorf
and his excellent vacuum found something even more intriguing. As
the amount of air in the Crooke’s tube decreased, the Faraday
Dark Space widened to fill the whole tube, and the negative plate
emitted rays that made the glass tube glow.
Rays and Radiation
The rays
sparked an eagerness in Hittorf — and in every other physicist
who heard of them. Suddenly every electricity enthusiast in Europe
and America was working on Hittorf’s mysterious rays …
and purchasing Geissler’s pump. Eugene Goldstein dubbed them
“cathode rays,” because they came from the negatively
charged plate — the cathode — of the Crooke’s tube.
 |
Wilhelm Roentgen, the German
physicist who discovered X-rays. Source: Pennsylvania State
University. |
Despite the horde of physicists working on cathode
rays, by the 1890s little progress had been made. Working tirelessly
on the problem, Heinrich Hertz and his student Phillip Lenard had
made the most progress of anyone and had determined that the cathode
rays could pierce aluminum and several centimeters of air. This
was quite something, since ultraviolet (UV) rays and other types
of radiation are blocked by aluminum.
A scant 150 miles from Hertz and Lenard, physicist
Wilhelm Roentgen was left deeply puzzled by their
discovery. To test it, he covered his own Crooke’s tube with
black cardboard so he could watch the rays hit the air. As he darkened
the lab to begin the experiment, Roentgen noticed a weak light shimmering
on his workbench. The glow was coming from a bit of barium platinocyanide
that he had left lying there. This was nothing unusual — UV
light makes barium platinocyanide fluoresce brightly, and the Crooke’s
tube did indeed produce UV light. Roentgen, however, was shocked.
He had covered the Crooke’s tube with cardboard, and he knew
that no UV light could come through. Hittorf’s cathode rays
could travel but a few centimeters through air — not the many
meters to the work bench. Stunned, Roentgen realized that something
else was making it through the cardboard, and he didn’t know
what it could be.
Roentgen
experimented obsessively with his new puzzle, and by 1895 he had
reached an impossible conclusion: the Crooke’s tube was emitting
some new type of radiation. To reflect his bewilderment, Roentgen
dubbed the new rays “X-rays.”
Scientists on the Warpath
Roentgen
told no one of his new conclusion, since he was sure people would
think he was crazy. For two months after his epiphany, he reran his
experiments, reviewed his calculations, and wondered if he truly had
gone mad. He exposed all manner of things to his X-rays and found,
notably, that lead and bone blocked the radiation, but not flesh.
Curious, he had his wife place her hand in front of an exposure of
film, and bombarded it with X-rays. What he made was the first-ever
X-ray photograph.
Spirits
lifted and armed with an image of the bones in his wife’s
hand, Roentgen took a deep breath and announced his discovery on
January 1, 1896.
The
explosion that followed was to usher in a new era for science. Physicists
across Europe and America were stunned, and the scramble for answers
began. Hertz and Lenard dashed back to work on their Crooke’s
tube. J.J. Thomson, discoverer of the electron, threw his gold-leafed
electroscope to work. Thomas Edison announced a public X-raying
of an entire human skeleton. Doctors and surgeons immediately began
taking X-rays of patients with broken bones (much to their misfortune,
since the intensity of the X-rays they used caused serious burns).
Ernest Rutherford, then but a student, wrote to a friend in America
that “nearly every Professor in Europe is now on the warpath.”
And they were — every great name in physics and chemistry
was possessed by the spirit of discovery.
 |
Marie
Curie, the French chemist who, with her husband, discovered
radiation in the late 1800s. Her discovery was fueled by Roentgen's
discovery of X-rays. Source: Archives Curie et Joliot-Curie. |
The
discoveries began pouring in. Henri Becquerel discovered an entirely
new set of rays, emitted by uranium. Marie and Pierre Curie in Paris
threw themselves into a study of Becquerel’s rays and discovered
polonium, radium, and radioactive decay. Ernest Rutherford discovered
alpha and beta rays. The complexities of the atom were quickly becoming
clear.
Within
five years of Roentgen’s discovery of X-rays, the world of
science was thrown into a frenzy of discovery. An entirely new facet
of physics had suddenly opened to the scientists, and a new suite
of elements and radiation types were discovered in rapid succession.
Although physicists and chemists were the prime movers of the new
revolution, all of science was affected. Doctors, surgeons, and
anatomists were suddenly X-raying people (though the technique would
not be refined for decades); mathematicians were thrown puzzles
of radioactive decay rates. Geologists began to measure the ages
of rocks and minerals for the first time, obtaining what were to
them outrageous ages — rocks that were billions of years old
on an Earth that they believed to be only a few hundred thousand
years old. Astronomers joined the warpath as they found the rays
raining down from space. Those most affected, though, were the physicists
and chemists, who were beginning to glimpse the internal complexities
of the atom for the first time.
The
Turn of the Century and the Turn of Physics
 |
| The first X-ray photograph
ever taken: Wilhelm Roentgen’s wife’s hand. The large glob
you see on her finger is her wedding ring. Source: Pennsylvania
State University. |
Down
the street from the Curies and their radioactive cauldrons, the
French physicist Paul Villard was experimenting with the Curies’
radioactive elements. The elements all emitted a radiation of their
own, puzzling Villard. Most dismissed the radiation as X-rays; however,
the radiation from the Curies’ elements was much more penetrating
than X-rays. Others thought them to be alpha or beta particles;
however, they were unaffected by electric or magnetic fields. In
1900, after years of experimenting, Villard proclaimed that they
were something new altogether: gamma rays.
X-rays caused
an enormous public stir, but not gamma rays. The scientific community
was already ray-crazed, and one more ray hardly fazed them. The
public was unimpressed — gamma rays couldn’t give you
photographs of your skeleton, after all. Rutherford, however, was
intrigued and looked closer. By 1914, he had shown that gamma rays
are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and that they have higher
energies and shorter wavelengths than X-rays.
Rutherford
showed that radioactive elements emit gamma rays with alpha or beta
particles from their nuclei as they decay. Over the next 30 years,
physicists expanded this idea back into the structure of the atom.
A gamma ray photon has momentum, so if an atom absorbs it, the atom
jerks backward slightly in a recoil. The atom would experience an
increase in energy from the gamma ray; however, this energy should
be less than that of the ray, due to energy lost in recoil. The
atom could then re-emit a gamma ray, but at a much lower energy.
This interpretation was well established by the 1950s.
Probing the Gamma Ray
In the mid-1950s,
a young graduate student named Rudolf L. Mossbauer began examining
the gamma ray absorption theory described above in more detail.
Through repeated experimentation, he discovered that, by placing
the absorbing nucleus in a crystal lattice, no recoil occurred.
The momentum of the incoming gamma ray was absorbed by the entire
lattice, and the absorbing atom could then reemit the gamma ray
at the same energy level.
This may not
sound like much — but it won Mossbauer a Nobel Prize in 1961.
The Mossbauer effect provides the opportunity to detect extremely
small energy and velocity shifts within the lattice. In short, by
rigging up a Mossbauer detector, minute differences in the energies
of incoming gamma rays, X-rays, or alpha particles are easily detected.
In the 1960s, several Harvard University astronomers used this technique
to detect tiny differences in incoming radiation to detect gravitational
red shifts as small as 1%.
The
Mossbauer effect was quickly adapted for use in Mossbauer spectroscopy.
This is the process of analyzing a material based on how it interacts
with gamma rays, and it is used to reveals the properties of minerals.
Mossbauer spectroscopy is especially useful for measuring the composition
of iron minerals (such as hematite and magnetite), their abundances
within rocks, and their oxidation states. Such measurements provide
information not only on formation conditions but also on the sort
of magnetism a rock has been exposed to. For a rock you can hold
in your hand, there are easier ways to determine these qualities.
But for a rock you can’t hold, for a rock that will never
come within arms’ reach, a Mossbauer spectrometer and a small
robot to run it is a great opportunity.
The Spirit and Opportunity
 |
A drawing of the Spirit rover,
set to arrive at Mars in late January 2004. Its twin, the
Opportunity, will arrive at Mars in February 2004. Source:
NASA. |
In
June and July of 2003, NASA launched its rover twins Spirit and
Opportunity, bound for Mars.
Aboard
each of the small rovers, a hand-sized Mossbauer spectrometer is
waiting for the iron-rich Martian surface, where they will patiently
measure the gamma rays leaving Martian rocks. Above each Mossbauer
spectrometer is a head-like machine that will measure the X-rays
and alpha particles emitted by the Martian rocks — determining
their chemistry and composition.
This is a rare
time in planetary exploration — two satellites orbit Mars,
two more are on their way, and three rovers will arrive at the planet
within months (the third will come from the European Space Agency).
The data pouring in has already revealed ancient coastlines, where
a Martian ocean once lay; evidence of glaciers on the sides of enormous
volcanoes; astounding contemporary reservoirs of water just below
the surface; young valleys and streambeds where liquid water once
flowed; and deposits of the iron oxide mineral hematite the size
of Oregon.
As
the Mars rover twins and their Mossbauer and X-ray spectrometers
hasten toward the Red Planet, astronomers and geologists are caught
in very much the same spirit of discovery and excitement that accompanied
Roentgen’s X-rays, in the same spirit of eclectic study that
absorbed Swedenborg. Where once a single gifted scientist was all
that was required to explore the world, or a small group all that
was required to uncover the mysteries of the atom, an entire community
of technicians, engineers, and specialized scientists is now reaching
beyond the bounds of our planet, in the same spirit of the scientists
before them, but with the opportunity for discoveries far beyond
those who came before.
Discuss this article!
Suggested Reading
Agassi
J. (1993) Radiation theory and the quantum revolution. Birkhäuser
Verlag: Boston.
Benz E. (2002) Emanuel Swedenborg: Visionary savant
in the age of reason. Swedenborg Foundation: West Chester, PA.
A Brief
History of Radiation. (2003) Available: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/nihal.amerasekera/history.html.
Danon
J. (1968) Lectures on the Mössbauer effect. Gordon and Breach:
New York.
Delchar TA. (1993) Vacuum physics and techniques. Chapman
& Hall: New York.
Dickson D. (1986) Mössbauer spectroscopy.
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Dry S. (2003) Curie. Haus: London.
Hall
T. (1984) The medium and the scientist: the story of Florence Cook
and William Crookes. Prometheus Books: Buffalo, NY.
Mars Exploration
Program. (2003) Available: http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/.
Mars Exploration
Rover Mission. (2003) Available: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/.
Mössbauer
spectroscopy. (2003) Available: http://defects.physics.wsu.edu/ME-setup.html
Nitske
WR. (1971) The life of Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, discoverer of
the X ray. University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ.
O’Hare JG.
(1987) Hertz and the Maxwellians : a study and documentation of the
discovery of electromagnetic wave radiation, 1873-1894. Peregrinus
Ltd: London.
Pflaum R. (1989) Grand obsession: Madame Curie and her
world. Doubleday, New York.
Trenn TJ. (1977) The self-splitting atom:
the history of the Rutherford-Soddy collaboration. Taylor and Francis:
London.
Journal
of Young Investigators. 2003. Volume Nine.
Copyright © 2003 by Selby Cull and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|