|
|
Issue 2, August 2002
Homeopathy: The Art of Micro-dosage
Jean Lee
Integrative Biology, University of California at Berkeley
lee@jyi.org
The
hallmark of Western medicine appears in its astounding technology,
scientific applications, medical tools, and emergency procedures.
Nevertheless, the wonderful miracles rendered through western medicine
- the artificial hearts, the iron lungs, the surgeries, and so forth
- still cannot hide its drawbacks.
For example, Western medicine is very drug-oriented; large, continual
doses of medicines are prescribed, accompanied by the numerous side
effects they cause. It is said another weakness of Western medicine
is that it dehumanizes people by treating the human body as a machine.
If the machinery is broken, the problem must be identified and pinpointed
to an area that must be "fixed."
It is obvious by cursory examination that humans are not identical
"machines" with a prescribed disease as the common denominator.
This is one idea explicitly acknowledged by an alternative medicinal
practice known as homeopathy. As compared with Western medical practices,
the uniqueness of homeopathic medicine is evident in at least three
distinctive characteristics.
Characteristics of homeopathy
First,
homeopathic medicine considers the singular philosophy that "like
can cure like." Second, homeopathic practices can be closely identified
with nano-pharmacology, the use of extremely small doses of herbs,
minerals, or even toxins in order to carry out a specific effect
or desired treatment. Finally, homeopathy encompasses a preventative
and holistic method of treating patients, with the full expectation
that a patient needs to participate in his or her own well being
and recovery. In other words, the integrity of the human body -
that is, its ability to heal itself better than any outside influence
- is held in the highest regard by homeopathic practitioners. This
ability for the body to heal itself is referred to as the vital
force.
| |
The homeopathic belief that "like can cure like" is traceable
as far back as the 5th century B.C.
|
The
homeopathic belief that "like can cure like" is traceable as far
back as the 5th century B.C. during the time of Hippocrates, known
as the "Father of Medicine." Hippocrates treated cholera with Veratrum
album (white hellebore), which in large doses causes emesis
and dehydration, the symptoms of cholera. The symptoms of the disease,
whether chronic or acute, must mimic the remedy in order to fit
the homeopathic rule. The intricacies of this philosophy result
in rather fascinating associations in use as remedies today. Examples
of this, outlined in the Complete Guide to Homeopathy, are
honeybees being used to treat insect stings and coffee beans being
used to treat insomnia.
Named and founded by the German doctor Samuel Christian Hahnemann
in 1755, homeopathy in fact means "similar suffering" and "treatment
by the same." After administering himself quinine from cinchona
bark, used to treat malaria, Hahnemann found that he developed symptoms
very similar to malaria, but did not have the disease itself.
After extensive testing of a variety of herbs, and even toxins,
drawn from plants and minerals, Hahnemann first published his work
on the homeopathic system in 1796. In 1831 the cholera outbreak
in central Europe proved the use of homeopathy; the death rates
at homeopathic hospitals in London showed a nearly 30% reduction
compared to elsewhere in Europe. Homeopathy reached the United States
in the 1820s through doctors Constantine Hering and James Tyler
Kent and persists today.
Small, diluted doses
Homeopathic
remedies are extremely small in dose and highly diluted. The more
dilute the remedy, the stronger it is considered in potency. Prepared
remedies can be so dilute that by chemical conventions there is
statistically no dosage at all but just the solvent (some alcohol
and mostly water). Critics attest that homeopathic water is no different
from untreated water. However, Klaus et al., in the June 2001 issue
of the International Journal of Epidemiology showed that
the so-called "just water" in a homeopathic remedy shows more thermodynamic
activity (that is, chemical heat energy) than actual "just water."
Moreover, water used in a remedy is double distilled, ensuring that
any substance put into the water will be completely associated and
present.
Critics attest that homeopathic water is no different from untreated
water.
|
|
Homeopaths
prefer to call this process potentization. The micro-, indeed nano-,
dosage involved would not work unless the patient "matches" the
remedy. Homeopaths need to spend significant amounts of time for
diagnosis, in order to see if the patient will be hypersensitive
to the remedy or not. This hypersensitivity is crucial for curing
the symptoms.
The homeopathic attitude to patient care is intensive and the medicinal
goals of homeopathic medicine are comprehensive; the patient's emotional,
spiritual, and mental states are treated in addition to disease
or disability. People are fundamentally different because of genetic
variation, age and gender.
People react differently
Homeopathic doctors
recognize that these differences cause people to react in varying
manners when remedies are introduced as well when afflictions occur.
Not only are patients' physical constitutions and symptoms considered,
but their tastes, habits, emotions, and even life stories are also
considered in the diagnosis and treatment. Does this person "feel
a shadow"? Does this person sigh a lot during the diagnosis? Does
this person feel oppressed by his/her spouse or job? Has the patient
experienced other illnesses in the past? Based upon analysis of
answers to these questions and other data, people can be grouped
into 15 general homeopathic "constitution" categories.
|
Possible
Criteria in Homeopathic Assessment of a Patient
|
- Signs
and symptoms of the current illness
- Food
preferences and dietary habits
- Personality
and emotional character
- Responses
to general factors, such as weather and time of day
- Fears
and dislikes
- Personal
habits, such as hygiene or facial expressions
|
| |
|
The
homeopathic constitution of a patient can include anything from
personal hygiene or habits to food preferences, complexion, and
body shape. For example, the Natrum muriadicum type of person
has a pear-shaped body with darker skin tones, a tendency for constipation,
and reclusive nature. Natrum-type people also like salty
foods.
Homeopaths acknowledge that any given patient can constitute a combination
of multiple categories. Potencies vary based on these categories
and diagnoses, but the most important mandate of homeopathy is that
the body expresses itself when it is ill; this illness manifests
itself varyingly in each type of person and involves the whole person's
life. Illness signifies an imbalance, either chronic or acute, that
causes the body to attempt to readjust, and homeopaths see this
as a vital part of their art - to "help" the body readjust.
Overcoming skepticism
Despite the historical support of homeopathy and the recent increase
in practice and interest of homeopathic medicine, there still exists
a cloud of skepticism and doubt surrounding its validity. The controversy
of homeopathy lies in its apparent ability to work in spite of the
fact that is has little or poorly accepted scientific explanation
for its action.
More and more clinical trials, such as double-blind placebo studies,
are being conducted on the dynamics of homeopathic remedies. Complementary
usage, such as in surgery, has also proved useful and safe. The
successes achieved by homeopaths in treating cholera in the 19th
century, mustard gas burns during World War II, and current laboratory
trials help demonstrate real effects.
In the future, this benevolent yet effective system of healing will
hopefully survive and continue to develop. Whether Western or no,
the integration and dialogue between existing medicinal systems
contribute a vast and precious understanding of each system to the
practice of human medicine.
Suggested Reading
Clover, Anne, M.D. Thorsons Introductory Guide to Homeopathy. London:
HarperCollins, 1991.
Jacobs et al., Treatment of acute childhood diarrhea with homeopathic
medicine: a randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua. Pediatrics. 93
(1994): 5.
Kessler et al., Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative
medical therapies in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine
135 (4) (August, 21, 2001): 262-268.
Klaus et al., The methodological quality of randomized controlled
trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture. International
Journal of Epidemiology. 30 (3) (June, 2001): 526-531.
Lockie, Andrew, M.D., Geddes, Nicola, M.D., The Complete Guide to
Homeopathy: The Principle and Practice of Treatment. London : Dorling
Kindersley, Limited., 1995. 1-30.
Subramanian et al., Standardization and quality control in homeopathic
medicinal plants. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences.
22-23 (4A-1A) (October-March, 2000-2001) : 628-632.
Ullman, Dana, M.P.H. Homeopathic Medicine: A Modern View. Whole Earth
Review. (Fall 1993): 100-104
Wickham, Cynthia. Common Plants As Natural Remedies. London: Frederick
Muller, Limited., 1981. 5-15.
Journal of Young
Investigators. 2002. Volume Six.
Copyright © 2002 by Jean Lee and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|