Journal of Young Investigators
    Undergraduate, Peer-Reviewed Science Journal
Volume Six
    RESEARCH ARTICLE
RECENT ISSUES | ARCHIVES | RESOURCES | JYI NEWS | ABOUT JYI 
Issue 1, July 2002

Biological & Biomedical Sciences
Factors That Affect Total Inpatient Drainage Output After TRAM Flap Surgery

Nina Prabhu
University of Texas at Austin
Advisor: Adel Youssef, MD, Ph.D.; Howard Langstein, MD
The University of Texas / M.D. Anderson Cancer Center / Department of Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Following transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery, physicians generally limit the patient's rehabilitation process until total drainage output is low, usually less than 30 cc during a 24-hour period. Therefore, each patient has a different rehabilitation process based on individual drainage output, and there is no standardized physical therapy schedule. Despite this, knowing whether certain variables correlate with drainage output would be beneficial for the timing of rehabilitation. This study examines patient age, body mass index (BMI), and side of reconstruction (right vs. left) for a correlation with total inpatient drainage output. For eighty-five patients who underwent free TRAM flap surgery over a one-year period, patient age, BMI, extent of axillary dissection, side of reconstruction (left, right, or bilateral), and the vessels used in microsurgery were recorded. No correlation was observed for age and drainage output. A positive correlation, however, was observed for BMI and drainage output. The two BMI groups with lower values (< 25 and 25-30) had significantly less drainage output in comparison to the third group (BMI > 30). There was also a statistically significant correlation between the side of reconstruction and drainage output. Interestingly, the left side produced more drainage than the right side. Further study of these three variables and others, such as immediate versus delayed reconstruction, is needed to guide the timing of and to maximize patient rehabilitation following TRAM flap surgery.

 

Introduction

Breast cancer is a widespread problem for women in industrialized nations; the lifetime risk is one in eight for Americans ("Breast Cancer Facts and Figures" 2002). The current treatment often involves disfiguring mastectomies, which are usually psychologically distressing to women (Mock 1994). Fortunately, reconstructive plastic surgeons can improve the quality of life outcome by providing substitute breasts for mastectomy patients. While reconstructive breast surgery clearly aids the mastectomy patient psychologically, there are questions regarding the patient's physical state after breast reconstruction, specifically following the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap operation.

TRAM flap surgery involves removal of part of the transverse rectus abdominis muscle and the surrounding skin and fat. The island of skin, fat, and muscle is removed with the dissection of the attached blood vessels and then molded into a breast form on the patient's chest. The blood vessels are usually attached to the thoracodorsal or internal mammary arteries through microsurgery. The TRAM flap surgery is sometimes referred to as the "tummy-tuck" reconstruction because it can result in a flatter stomach. Sometimes, a synthetic mesh overlay is used as reinforcement if the abdomen is pulled too tight (Walker 2000).

It is not uncommon to find patients who experience problems with their upper extremities, including shoulder joint stiffness and muscle shortening, after this surgery (Thomas 1993). Muscle groups and joints near the involved site may be weak and inflexible as a result of the surgery. The upper extremity problems may last anywhere from a couple of weeks to some years. Patients may experience mild to severe problems with range of motion or frequent pain sensation. Physical therapy as soon after surgery as possible is the accepted solution to prevent and correct such problems. Yet the ideal time to begin therapy after TRAM flap surgery is not standardized. Presently, surgeons are generally hesitant to prescribe physical therapy if the patient is still producing significant amounts of drainage from their wound catheters as exercise may stimulate lymphatic flow and increase drainage. High volumes of drainage output is one of the factors, like low blood count, fatigue, joint, or bone pain, that can hinder a patient's rehabilitation schedule. Therefore, patients who produce greater drainage outputs must wait longer to begin therapy than those who produce less drainage.

Although surgical drains were first used in mastectomy patients as early as 1947 (Murphey 1947), medical knowledge concerning drainage output is relatively limited. Few studies have been performed on different aspects of postoperative drainage. For example, one study by Petrek et al. demonstrated that the number of surgical drains (single vs. multiple) has no correlation with the amount of drainage output after lymphadenectomy (1992). Another study by Terrell and Singer (1992) found no significant correlation between the location of the drain(s) (axillary vs. combined axillary and pectoral drains) and the amount of drainage after modified radical mastectomy.

In order to help physicians predict when patients should begin physical therapy, this study examined different variables that could correlate with drainage output. Specially, the patient's age, body mass index (BMI), and side of reconstruction (left vs. right) after TRAM flap surgery were tested for a correlation with drainage output.

The hypothesis was that the younger and more active patients would produce more drainage than the older and more sedentary patients. The reasoning behind this idea is that with increased activity there is increased cardiac output, which results in more blood flowing to the tissues and more fluid in the interstitial space, lymphatic drainage. It was also expected that people with larger BMIs would have more drainage than those with lower BMIs. This supposition derived from the basic premise that larger people are capable of producing more drainage than smaller people. Finally, it was hypothesized that side of reconstruction should bear no correlation with drainage output. This assumption was based on the anatomical likeness of both the right and left axillae.

Patients and Methods

Eighty-five patients ranging in age from 25 to 63 years (mean age: 47.6) who underwent free TRAM flap surgeries consecutively at M.D. Anderson hospital between the dates of January 3, 2000 and January 24, 2001 were used in this retrospective study. The patients differed in the types of reconstruction they underwent: left unilateral free TRAM flaps, right unilateral free TRAM flaps, or bilateral free TRAM flaps. Except for three cases, all of the patients chose immediate reconstructions following their mastectomies, as immediate reconstruction provides various advantages and does not seem to increase the risk of recurrence (Kroll et al. 1991). Of the three who underwent delayed reconstruction, one was a woman with a left unilateral free TRAM flap, and the other two were women who had bilateral free TRAM flaps as an immediate right-side reconstruction but a delayed left-side reconstruction. Except for five cases, all of the patients had microsurgery performed on their thoracodorsal vessels. Four of the five exceptions had left unilateral free TRAM flaps and microsurgery on their internal mammary arteries instead. The fifth exception was a bilateral free TRAM patient whose microsurgery involved using the thoracodorsals on her right side and the internal mammaries on her left side.

Individual BMIs were calculated in kg/m2 by dividing the patient's weight (kg) by the square of her height (m). BMIs ranged from 19.1 kg/m2 to 39.25 kg/m2 (mean: 26.4 kg/m2). BMIs are generally categorized in four groups: those ranging in value between 18.5 and 24.9 are considered normal; those between 25 and 29.9 are considered overweight; those between 30 and 40 are considered obese; and those over 40 are considered morbidly obese (Willett et al. 1999). For this study, however, the patients were divided into three categories: those with BMIs less than 25, those between 25 and 30, and those with BMIs above 30.. To examine the variable of age, patients were grouped by decade. To properly isolate the effects of age, all other factors were kept the same so that each patient group underwent the same extent of axillary dissection, the same side of reconstruction, and used the same type of recipient vessels. The patients' inpatient drainage outputs (cc) were determined upon examining the nursing notes, in which nurses and hospital staff maintain daily records of the drainage outputs during the standard five days of hospitalization. As this study involved breast drains only, the first drain was placed in the patient's axilla and if a second drain was needed, it was placed under the mastectomy flap. Thus, total drainage is the aggregate sum of fluid in all breast drains in the patient regardless of their placements.

An ANOVA test was used to determine the relationship between age and total drainage output and the relationship between side of reconstruction and total drainage output. The relationship between BMI and total drainage output was determined using Bartlett's test for equal variances.

Results

The total inpatient drainage output ranged from 82 to 2189 cc with a mean of 647.0 + 404.7 cc. The ANOVA test displayed that there was no correlation between age and total drainage output (Figure 1), but did demonstrate with statistical significance that the left side produced more drainage than the right side (p = 0.0111) (Figure 2). The mean total drainage for the reconstruction on the right side was 461.8 + 266.3 cc, and the corresponding mean for the left side was 626.5 + 362.7 cc. There was a statistically significant correlation between the lower two BMI groups and total drainage output. The under 25 BMI group had a mean total drainage of 536.4 + 318.4 cc. The 25-30 BMI group had a mean total drainage of 799.9 + 495.2 cc. Finally, the over 30 BMI group had a mean total drainage of 652.9 + 369.0 cc (Figure 3). This trend shows a slight positive correlation at lower BMIs, a flat curve at moderate levels, and a slight increase at very high BMIs. Very few patients actually underwent TRAM flaps with BMI values near 40. The results show that those who did had increased drainage, which supports the general policy that these people are not good candidates for the operation.




Figure 1. No correlation between age and total drainage output.





Figure 2. Left side produces more drainage (p = 0.0111).






Figure 3. Slight positive correlation between BMI and total drainage output for low and high BMIs.

Discussion

This study found that certain factors positively correlated with the amount of wound catheter drainage in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Unexpectedly, age was not one of them. In fact, no correlation was observed between age and outpatient drainage. It had been hypothesized that younger and more active people would produce more drainage than older and more sedentary people because increased activity correlates with increased cardiac output. This usually translates into greater blood flow, more fluid in the interstitial space, and greater lymphatic drainage. However, the null result obtained could be explained by the hypothesis that in younger, more active people, high total drainage outputs are counterbalanced by better organ functioning and thus faster drainage rates.

The positive correlation between the lower two BMI groups and total inpatient drainage output was anticipated. Within the lower two BMI value groups, BMI positively correlated with drainage output. This concords with intuition, i.e. that larger people are likely to produce more drainage output than smaller people. More technically, larger patients have larger diameter axillae and thus more channels, which often means greater lymph flow. With the disruption of more channels during axillary dissection, one would expect more flow. However, in this study, there was a limit to this correlation; the over 30 BMI group did not show any correlation between BMI and drainage output. This could be because there were fewer patients in this BMI range. There were only 20 obese patients in the entire study; only six patients were in that category for the right unilateral free TRAMs, only 10 for the left unilateral free TRAMs, and only four in the bilateral free TRAMs. Furthermore, most surgeons avoid this type of surgery in obese patients for fear of other complications.

It was originally hypothesized that there would be no correlation between side of reconstruction and drainage output. However, in this study, the left side produced more drainage than the right side. While there are no obvious reasons why the left side on average had a greater total drainage output than the right, various possibilities do exist. There could be slight anatomical differences between the left and right axillae. The handedness of the patient could play a role. A third possibility is that handedness could account for the differences. (Like the general population, the majority of surgeons are right-handed.) Handedness could cause a surgeon to use slightly different surgical techniques on each side of the patient and/or simply make the surgeon more adept at performing the surgery on one side. Alternatively, a combination of all these possibilities could explain the findings. Further study that takes into account surgical technique and the handedness of the surgeon might help to resolve this issue.

This study examined the factors of age, BMI, and side of reconstruction and their relationships to total inpatient drainage in TRAM flap surgery patients. Yet there are many other factors that could be examined in terms of their effects on wound catheter drainage. As drainage output is one of the determinants of a patient's physical therapy schedule, further study should focus on various factors related to drainage and their roles in rehabilitation. Though the factors used in this study were not - with the possible exception of BMI - under the patient's control, there are other factors that are results of the patient's and doctor's choices, such as immediate or delayed reconstruction. If factors such as these are identified, surgeons can choose options that are most conducive to a full recovery by the patient. Knowing how factors - both controllable and uncontrollable - affect drainge output and patient rehabilition would be beneficial to the timing and maximization of patient recovery.


References

"Breast Cancer Facts and Figures." Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2002. http://www.cancer.org

Mock, Victoria et al. "A Nursing Rehabilitation Program for Women with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy." Oncology Nursing Forum- Vol 21, No.5, 1994.

Walker, E.P. "Reconstruction with Tissue Flaps." 2000. http://www.plasticsurgery.co.nz

Thomas, C.L. (1993) Mastectomy. Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary Edition. 17: 1170.

Murphey, B.R. (1947) The use of atmospheric pressure in obliterating axillary dead space following radical mastectomy. South Surg. 13: 372-375.

Petrek, J.A. (1992) A prospective randomized trial of single versus multiple drains in the axilla after lymphadenectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 175: 405-409.

Terrell, G.S. and J.A. Singer. (1992) Axillary versus combined axillary and pectoral drainage after modified radical mastectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 175: 437-440.

Kroll, S.S., F. Ames, S.E. Singletary, and M.A. Schusterman. (1991)

Willett, W.C., W.H. Dietz, and G.A. Colditz. (1999) "Primary care: guidelines for healthy weight." The New England Journal of Medicine. 341 (6): 427-434.


Journal of Young Investigators. 2002. Volume Six.
Copyright © 2002 by Nina Prabhu and JYI. All rights reserved.
 
SEARCH   |   SITE MAP   |   RECENT WEB SITE ADDITIONS          PRIVACY POLICY  |    CONTACT US

JYI is supported by: The National Science Foundation, The Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Science Magazine, Science's Next Wave, Swarthmore College, Duke University, Georgetown University, and many others.
Copyright ©1998-2003 The Journal of Young Investigators, Inc.