|
|
Issue 1, July 2002
Biological & Biomedical Sciences
Factors That Affect Total Inpatient Drainage Output After TRAM Flap Surgery
Nina Prabhu
University of Texas at Austin
Advisor: Adel Youssef, MD, Ph.D.; Howard Langstein, MD
The University of Texas / M.D. Anderson Cancer Center / Department of Plastic Surgery
Abstract
Following transverse
rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery, physicians generally
limit the patient's rehabilitation process until total drainage output
is low, usually less than 30 cc during a 24-hour period. Therefore,
each patient has a different rehabilitation process based on individual
drainage output, and there is no standardized physical therapy schedule.
Despite this, knowing whether certain variables correlate with drainage
output would be beneficial for the timing of rehabilitation. This
study examines patient age, body mass index (BMI), and side of reconstruction
(right vs. left) for a correlation with total inpatient drainage output.
For eighty-five patients who underwent free TRAM flap surgery over
a one-year period, patient age, BMI, extent of axillary dissection,
side of reconstruction (left, right, or bilateral), and the vessels
used in microsurgery were recorded. No correlation was observed for
age and drainage output. A positive correlation, however, was observed
for BMI and drainage output. The two BMI groups with lower values
(< 25 and 25-30) had significantly less drainage output in comparison
to the third group (BMI > 30). There was also a statistically significant
correlation between the side of reconstruction and drainage output.
Interestingly, the left side produced more drainage than the right
side. Further study of these three variables and others, such as immediate
versus delayed reconstruction, is needed to guide the timing of and
to maximize patient rehabilitation following TRAM flap surgery.
Introduction
Breast cancer is
a widespread problem for women in industrialized nations; the lifetime
risk is one in eight for Americans ("Breast Cancer Facts and Figures"
2002). The current treatment often involves disfiguring mastectomies,
which are usually psychologically distressing to women (Mock 1994).
Fortunately, reconstructive plastic surgeons can improve the quality
of life outcome by providing substitute breasts for mastectomy patients.
While reconstructive breast surgery clearly aids the mastectomy
patient psychologically, there are questions regarding the patient's
physical state after breast reconstruction, specifically following
the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap operation.
TRAM flap surgery involves removal of part of the transverse rectus
abdominis muscle and the surrounding skin and fat. The island of
skin, fat, and muscle is removed with the dissection of the attached
blood vessels and then molded into a breast form on the patient's
chest. The blood vessels are usually attached to the thoracodorsal
or internal mammary arteries through microsurgery. The TRAM flap
surgery is sometimes referred to as the "tummy-tuck" reconstruction
because it can result in a flatter stomach. Sometimes, a synthetic
mesh overlay is used as reinforcement if the abdomen is pulled too
tight (Walker 2000).
It is not uncommon to find patients who experience problems with
their upper extremities, including shoulder joint stiffness and
muscle shortening, after this surgery (Thomas 1993). Muscle groups
and joints near the involved site may be weak and inflexible as
a result of the surgery. The upper extremity problems may last anywhere
from a couple of weeks to some years. Patients may experience mild
to severe problems with range of motion or frequent pain sensation.
Physical therapy as soon after surgery as possible is the accepted
solution to prevent and correct such problems. Yet the ideal time
to begin therapy after TRAM flap surgery is not standardized. Presently,
surgeons are generally hesitant to prescribe physical therapy if
the patient is still producing significant amounts of drainage from
their wound catheters as exercise may stimulate lymphatic flow and
increase drainage. High volumes of drainage output is one of the
factors, like low blood count, fatigue, joint, or bone pain, that
can hinder a patient's rehabilitation schedule. Therefore, patients
who produce greater drainage outputs must wait longer to begin therapy
than those who produce less drainage.
Although surgical drains were first used in mastectomy patients
as early as 1947 (Murphey 1947), medical knowledge concerning drainage
output is relatively limited. Few studies have been performed on
different aspects of postoperative drainage. For example, one study
by Petrek et al. demonstrated that the number of surgical
drains (single vs. multiple) has no correlation with the amount
of drainage output after lymphadenectomy (1992). Another study by
Terrell and Singer (1992) found no significant correlation between
the location of the drain(s) (axillary vs. combined axillary and
pectoral drains) and the amount of drainage after modified radical
mastectomy.
In order to help physicians predict when patients should begin physical
therapy, this study examined different variables that could correlate
with drainage output. Specially, the patient's age, body mass index
(BMI), and side of reconstruction (left vs. right) after TRAM flap
surgery were tested for a correlation with drainage output.
The hypothesis was that the younger and more active patients would
produce more drainage than the older and more sedentary patients.
The reasoning behind this idea is that with increased activity there
is increased cardiac output, which results in more blood flowing
to the tissues and more fluid in the interstitial space, lymphatic
drainage. It was also expected that people with larger BMIs would
have more drainage than those with lower BMIs. This supposition
derived from the basic premise that larger people are capable of
producing more drainage than smaller people. Finally, it was hypothesized
that side of reconstruction should bear no correlation with drainage
output. This assumption was based on the anatomical likeness of
both the right and left axillae.
Patients and Methods
Eighty-five patients ranging in age from 25 to 63 years (mean age: 47.6) who underwent free TRAM flap surgeries consecutively at M.D. Anderson
hospital between the dates of January 3, 2000 and January 24, 2001 were used in this retrospective study. The patients differed in the
types of reconstruction they underwent: left unilateral free TRAM flaps, right unilateral free TRAM flaps, or bilateral free TRAM flaps.
Except for three cases, all of the patients chose immediate reconstructions following their mastectomies, as immediate reconstruction
provides various advantages and does not seem to increase the risk of recurrence (Kroll et al. 1991). Of the three who underwent delayed
reconstruction, one was a woman with a left unilateral free TRAM flap, and the other two were women who had bilateral free TRAM flaps as
an immediate right-side reconstruction but a delayed left-side reconstruction. Except for five cases, all of the patients had microsurgery
performed on their thoracodorsal vessels. Four of the five exceptions had left unilateral free TRAM flaps and microsurgery on their internal
mammary arteries instead. The fifth exception was a bilateral free TRAM patient whose microsurgery involved using the thoracodorsals on her right side
and the internal mammaries on her left side.
Individual BMIs were calculated in kg/m2 by dividing the patient's weight (kg) by the square of her height (m). BMIs ranged from
19.1 kg/m2 to 39.25 kg/m2 (mean: 26.4 kg/m2). BMIs are generally categorized in four groups: those ranging in
value between 18.5 and 24.9 are considered normal; those between 25 and 29.9 are considered overweight; those between 30 and 40 are considered
obese; and those over 40 are considered morbidly obese (Willett et al. 1999). For this study, however, the patients were divided into three categories: those with BMIs less than
25, those between 25 and 30, and those with BMIs above 30.. To examine the variable of age, patients were grouped by decade. To properly isolate the effects of age, all other factors were kept the same so that each patient group
underwent the same extent of axillary dissection, the same side of reconstruction, and used the same type of recipient vessels.
The patients' inpatient drainage outputs (cc) were determined upon examining the nursing notes, in which nurses and hospital staff
maintain daily records of the drainage outputs during the standard five days of hospitalization. As this study involved breast drains only, the first
drain was placed in the patient's axilla and if a second drain was needed, it was placed under the mastectomy flap. Thus, total drainage is the
aggregate sum of fluid in all breast drains in the patient regardless of their placements.
An ANOVA test was used to determine the relationship between age and total drainage output and the relationship between side of reconstruction and total drainage output.
The relationship between BMI and total drainage output was determined using Bartlett's test for equal variances.
Results
The total inpatient drainage output ranged from 82 to 2189 cc with
a mean of 647.0 +
404.7 cc. The ANOVA test displayed that there was no correlation
between age and total drainage output (Figure 1), but did demonstrate
with statistical significance that the left side produced more drainage
than the right side (p
= 0.0111) (Figure 2). The mean total drainage for the reconstruction
on the right side was 461.8 +
266.3 cc, and the corresponding mean for the left side was 626.5
+
362.7 cc. There was a statistically significant correlation between
the lower two BMI groups and total drainage output. The under 25
BMI group had a mean total drainage of 536.4 +
318.4 cc. The 25-30 BMI group had a mean total drainage of 799.9
+
495.2 cc. Finally, the over 30 BMI group had a mean total drainage
of 652.9 +
369.0 cc (Figure 3). This trend shows a slight positive correlation
at lower BMIs, a flat curve at moderate levels, and a slight increase
at very high BMIs. Very few patients actually underwent TRAM flaps
with BMI values near 40. The results show that those who did had
increased drainage, which supports the general policy that these
people are not good candidates for the operation.

Figure 1. No correlation between age and total drainage output.

Figure 2. Left side produces more drainage (p = 0.0111).

Figure 3. Slight positive correlation between BMI and total drainage
output for low and high BMIs.
Discussion
This study found that certain factors positively correlated with the
amount of wound catheter drainage in patients undergoing TRAM flap
breast reconstructions. Unexpectedly, age was not one of them. In
fact, no correlation was observed between age and outpatient drainage.
It had been hypothesized that younger and more active people would
produce more drainage than older and more sedentary people because
increased activity correlates with increased cardiac output. This
usually translates into greater blood flow, more fluid in the interstitial
space, and greater lymphatic drainage. However, the null result obtained
could be explained by the hypothesis that in younger, more active
people, high total drainage outputs are counterbalanced by
better organ functioning and thus faster drainage rates.
The positive correlation between the lower two BMI groups and total
inpatient drainage output was anticipated. Within the lower two BMI
value groups, BMI positively correlated with drainage output. This
concords with intuition, i.e. that larger people are likely to produce
more drainage output than smaller people. More technically, larger
patients have larger diameter axillae and thus more channels, which
often means greater lymph flow. With the disruption of more channels
during axillary dissection, one would expect more flow. However, in
this study, there was a limit to this correlation; the over 30 BMI
group did not show any correlation between BMI and drainage output.
This could be because there were fewer patients in this BMI range.
There were only 20 obese patients in the entire study; only six patients
were in that category for the right unilateral free TRAMs, only 10
for the left unilateral free TRAMs, and only four in the bilateral
free TRAMs. Furthermore, most surgeons avoid this type of surgery
in obese patients for fear of other complications.
It was originally hypothesized that there would be no correlation
between side of reconstruction and drainage output. However, in this
study, the left side produced more drainage than the right side. While
there are no obvious reasons why the left side on average had a greater
total drainage output than the right, various possibilities do exist.
There could be slight anatomical differences between the left and
right axillae. The handedness of the patient could play a role. A
third possibility is that handedness could account for the differences.
(Like the general population, the majority of surgeons are right-handed.)
Handedness could cause a surgeon to use slightly different surgical
techniques on each side of the patient and/or simply make the surgeon
more adept at performing the surgery on one side. Alternatively, a
combination of all these possibilities could explain the findings.
Further study that takes into account surgical technique and the handedness
of the surgeon might help to resolve this issue.
This study examined the factors of age, BMI, and side of reconstruction
and their relationships to total inpatient drainage in TRAM flap surgery
patients. Yet there are many other factors that could be examined
in terms of their effects on wound catheter drainage. As drainage
output is one of the determinants of a patient's physical therapy
schedule, further study should focus on various factors related to
drainage and their roles in rehabilitation. Though the factors used
in this study were not - with the possible exception of BMI - under
the patient's control, there are other factors that are results of
the patient's and doctor's choices, such as immediate or delayed reconstruction.
If factors such as these are identified, surgeons can choose options
that are most conducive to a full recovery by the patient. Knowing
how factors - both controllable and uncontrollable - affect drainge
output and patient rehabilition would be beneficial to the timing
and maximization of patient recovery.
References
"Breast Cancer Facts and Figures." Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2002. http://www.cancer.org
Mock, Victoria et al. "A Nursing Rehabilitation Program for Women with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy."
Oncology Nursing Forum- Vol 21, No.5, 1994.
Walker, E.P. "Reconstruction with Tissue Flaps." 2000. http://www.plasticsurgery.co.nz
Thomas, C.L. (1993) Mastectomy. Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary Edition. 17: 1170.
Murphey, B.R. (1947) The use of atmospheric pressure in obliterating axillary dead space
following radical mastectomy. South Surg. 13: 372-375.
Petrek, J.A. (1992) A prospective randomized trial of single versus multiple drains in the
axilla after lymphadenectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 175: 405-409.
Terrell, G.S. and J.A. Singer. (1992) Axillary versus combined axillary and pectoral drainage
after modified radical mastectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 175: 437-440.
Kroll, S.S., F. Ames, S.E. Singletary, and M.A. Schusterman. (1991)
Willett, W.C., W.H. Dietz, and G.A. Colditz. (1999) "Primary care: guidelines for healthy
weight." The New England Journal of Medicine. 341 (6): 427-434.
Journal of Young
Investigators. 2002. Volume Six.
Copyright © 2002 by Nina Prabhu and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|