|
|
Issue 6, March 2002
Biochemical Techniques to Produce Transgenic Plants
Vikram Pattanayak
Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania
pattanayak@jyi.org
Over
the past decade, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been
in the news for their potential benefits and harms to society. Before
human cloning became an issue, the emergence of transgenic plants
-- plants with foreign genes introduced to provide enhanced traits
-- was the hot topic in biotechnology. These engineered crops seek
to provide better flavor, disease resistance, and increased nutritional
value just like traditional breeding methods (Kishore 1993; Ye 2000).
Biochemical and molecular biological procedures provide the technology
to genetically engineer plants, as well as the methods used to detect
them.
One common method of engineering plants uses recombinant DNA technology
mediated by the action of a soil bacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens,
to transfer DNA from bacteria to plants (Davey 1989). Once the transformation
has occurred, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) provides the ability
to detect the genetically altered plants, allowing scientists to
assess the success of the transformations, and in a different context,
study the spread of transgenic crop species in the wild (Gachet
1999).
Creating Genetically Modified Plants
Agrobacterium
tumefaciens contains a plasmid, a small circular piece of DNA
that has its own origin of replication and is replicated independently
of other nuclear material, that is key to its use in genetically
modifying plants. This plasmid, called a tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid,
interacts with compounds released by fractured plant cells. When
a wounded plant is exposed to A. tumefaciens, it integrates
a stretch of its DNA, called transferred DNA (T-DNA), to the plant's
genome by a recently elucidated mechanism (Van Attikum 2001).
Normally, the bacterium transfers its own T-DNA, but if the T-DNA
is removed and replaced with another gene, A. tumefaciens
can be used to introduce that gene into the plant genome, thereby
providing a vector for scientists to engineer beneficial genes into
plants (Horsch 1985). Studies have shown that native T-DNA genes
are not necessary for this process. Inserted genes get transferred
to plants as long as two repeated border sequences of 25 base pairs
flanking the genes are present in the vector (Schell 1987). The
Ti plasmid itself can only hold a 25 kilobase (kb) gene fragment,
so it can only be used for small genes. It can also be somewhat
difficult to work with (Hamilton 1996).
However,
other vectors can be used to perform the transformation. Binary
vectors, like the pBIN20 vector (Figure 1), are plasmids that contain
the 25 base pair border sequences, allowing the new genes within
them to be integrated into plant genomes, as well as marker genes
that are used later in the process to select for successful gene
transfer. The vectors also contain origins of replication for A.
tumefaciens and Escherichia coli (Walden 1990), a bacterium
commonly used in research. Therefore, the plasmids can replicate
themselves in either E. coli or A. tumefaciens, allowing
scientists to work with E. coli and then transfer the vectors
to A. tumefaciens through bacterial conjugation, the process
by which two bacteria exchange genetic information in the form of
plasmids, when the genes are ready to be inserted into the plant
genome.
Larger genes can be introduced to plants using bacterial artificial
chromosomes (BACs). BACs are synthesized gene vectors based on a
plasmid from E. coli (Griffiths 2000). BACs can have inserts
ranging from 50 to 350 kb, allowing for the transfer of large genes
or many small genes at once. The BACs used to transform plant cells
are binary vectors, termed binary-bacterial artificial chromosomes
(BIBACs)(Hamilton 1996). Like binary vectors, BIBACs contain gene
markers as well as the two flanking boundary regions. Two commonly
used gene markers in BIBACs and other binary vectors are neomycinphosphotransferase
II (NPTII), which confers resistance to the antibiotic kanamycin,
and hygromycin phosphotransferase, which gives resistance to the
antibiotic hygromycin. BIBACs have been shown to successfully transfer
the T-DNA insert between boundary regions to plants (Hamilton 1996),
making them useful options for A. tumefaciens-mediated gene
insertion.
Transgenes
can be inserted between the boundary regions of the BIBAC or other
binary vectors through the use of restriction enzymes and recombinant
DNA technology. Restriction enzymes cleave DNA at specific sites
within a sequence of base pairs. The restriction enzyme EcoRI, for
example, cuts both strands of double-stranded DNA between guanine
(G) and adenine (A) whenever it sees the palindromic sequence GAATTC.
It is called palindromic because one strand reads the same way as
its complement when read from its 5' end to the 3' end. Because
of this, the enzyme makes two cuts when it sees the recognition
sequence, one on each strand (Figure 2a).
Another enzyme, EcoRV, cuts between thymine (T) and adenine every
time it reads the sequence GATATC (Figure 2b). EcoRI and EcoRV represent
two different types of restriction enzymes. EcoRI cuts with sticky
ends, called "sticky" since each strand of cut DNA contains
a four-base-pair overhang that can hydrogen bond to (combine with)
a similar overhang on another molecule to form a double strand.
EcoRV has no such overhangs and therefore cuts with what are known
as blunt ends.
An
enzyme that cuts with sticky ends can be used to insert a foreign
gene into the vector of choice. If a restriction enzyme cuts the
vector once, creating a gap between two sticky ends, and the same
enzyme cuts on both sides of the coding region of the gene, it can
be inserted into the vector. This is accomplished by cutting both
with the enzyme and then "gluing" the gene fragment to
the vector using a DNA ligase that helps hydrogen bond the complementary
bases of the sticky ends (Figure 3). For example, this technique
can insert a gene into the pBIN20 vector (Figure 1) if a site for
the restriction enzyme Spe1, or any other sites found in the multi-cloning
site (MCS), flanks it.
Once
the appropriate vector is made and transferred to the A. tumefaciens
bacterium, it must be integrated into the plant genome. Figure 4
shows how this transformation is carried out. First, disks are punched
out from a plant leaf and incubated overnight with a culture of
vector-containing A. tumefaciens in Luria broth. The disks
are then placed in culture plates containing a medium that induces
the leaf disks to start growing shoots, which are the precursors
of the plant's stem and leaves. After a couple of days, these disks
are transferred to plates, which contain antibiotics corresponding
to the antibiotic-resistant marker genes placed in the vector. Only
those plant cells that have integrated T-DNA from the vector will
have antibiotic resistance. The medium therefore selects for the
transformed plant cells by killing those that do not contain the
vector. Once the transformed cells are selected, the growing shoots
are transferred to a root-inducing medium, where they grow roots,
and then to soil to grow into transgenic plants (Horsch 1985).
Detecting Genetically Modified Plants
Once the plants
have grown in soil, they must be tested to determine if they contain
a transferred gene. Although all of the grown plants are known to
contain T-DNA from between the boundary regions of the vector through
antibiotic selection, it is not yet known if the gene inserted into
the vector during the recombinant step or not. The main method used
to determine this is a fundamental procedure of biochemistry: polymerase
chain reaction (PCR). PCR amplifies specific DNA sequences, creating
millions of identical molecules using just one as a template.
PCR goes through many cycles of reactions, with each cycle containing
three steps. First, the double-stranded DNA molecule separates into
two strands when incubated at high temperatures (about 94° C), creating
two complementary single-stranded DNA molecules. Next, the temperature
is dropped to 55° C and two primers complementary to specific sequences
within the DNA molecule bind. The primers are DNA oligonucleotides,
short stretches of single-stranded DNA, which bind sequences that
precede the 5' end of the region to be amplified on either strand.
These primers bind to the complementary bases on the target DNA
molecule, creating short double-stranded portions of DNA. Fianlly,
the temperature is raised to 75° C, at which Taq polymerase, a heat-stable
DNA polymerase isolated from Thermus aquaticus, catalyzes
the extension of the primers on each strand. The polymerase recognizes
double-stranded DNA and adds free nucleotides (dNTPs) to the 3'
ends of the regions where the primers are bound (Voet 2001).
After the first cycle, one DNA molecule has become two molecules,
since each separated strand has been bound by primer and extended
by the polymerase. However, while these molecules contain the region
of interest, the stretch between the two primers, they contain bases
past the boundaries marked by the primers, since the polymerase
does not know where the other primer is and extends the chain indefinitely.
A second cycle of PCR amplifies the two newly synthesized strands
to produce two more molecules. These molecules still have one strand
that is longer than the target molecule. After the third cycle,
there are eight molecules, two of which are identical to the target.
Typically, PCR is carried out in 20 or more cycles, approximately
doubling the amount of DNA each time, resulting in about 220 (approx.
1 million) copies of the target molecule (Gachet 1999).
PCR can be used to determine if a plant contains the desired transgene
by extracting the plant's DNA and amplifying it. Since the sequence
of the transgene is known and present only in transformed cells,
PCR primers that recognize regions within the inserted T-DNA can
be made (Gachet 1999). PCR is run on the extracted plant DNA with
these primers, and a procedure called gel electrophoresis can determine
its success.
In gel electrophoresis, DNA or protein samples are loaded onto a
porous gel containing a network of agarose or polyacrylamide molecules.
Electrodes are connected across the gel (often the gel is placed
in a tank that has electrodes at its ends) causing a current to
pass through it. DNA carries a negative charge, so it moves through
the gel toward the positive electrode. The DNA encounters agarose
or polyacrylamide molecules that hinder its path, with smaller molecules
getting past these obstacles more quickly than larger ones. Since
many molecules are placed onto the gel, they will separate according
to size and form bands. The distances they travel are proportional
to their molecular weights. The resulting separated bands can be
detected using staining techniques or through the use of UV light
that illuminates a fluorescent dye molecule bound to the samples
before they are run.
The visualizing methods have sensitivities on the order of one nanogram
(Voet 2001), so only bands containing a large number of DNA molecules
can be seen. If the genes were successfully transferred to the plant,
the plant DNA would contain primer recognition sites and be amplified
by PCR, producing enough molecules to be seen on the gel. If the
gene is not present, the primers would not bind, and only one molecule
would be in the sample, producing no band when stained because of
the sensitivity of the procedure. Appropriate controls -- performing
PCR on a molecule that the primers should not recognize as well
as one of known sequence that they should recognize -- must be used
to show that known sequences were amplified and visualized only
if they contained regions corresponding to the primers (Quist 2001).
Detection of transgenic DNA in wild plants is a little more complicated.
Since this requires detecting DNA of unknown sequence, many different
primer targets must be chosen to give the best chance of amplifying
a transgene, if present. Three categories of sequences are often
targeted: regulatory sequences from transforming vectors, genetic
markers used to select the transformed cells during the engineering
process, and sequences within the transgenes themselves (Gachet
1999). One such primer target is the P35S promoter sequence of cauliflower
mosaic virus, as it is found in many commercial transgenic constructs
(Quist 2001).
Applications
for Genetically Modified Plants
The biochemical techniques
used to create different types of transgenic plants are similar for
each plant. However, the applications of these plants are quite diverse.
The two most widely used genetic modifications introduce a gene for
a toxin from the bacterium Bacillus thuringienisis (Bt). Bt
toxin has been used to provide insect-resistance to crops like corn
and soybean. Another application introduces genes that code for herbicide
resistance, allowing farmers to spray crops with chemicals that kill
weeds without harming the crops themselves (Ferber 1999). Both of
these alterations seek to increase the crops' yield by making them
more likely to survive. Other modifications seek to improve flavor
or add nutrients to crops. The Flavr-Savr tomato had a modification
that sought to improve taste by introducing traits allowing tomatoes
to ripen longer on the vine through the slowdown of an enzyme that
causes rotting. It was eventually taken off the market because it
was too soft to be transported to supermarkets without being damaged
(Moffat 1998). Another crop, golden rice, is engineered to be rich
in beta-carotene, a vitamin A precursor, in order to provide this
required nutrient to people who eat rice as their staple food. Creating
golden rice involves synthesizing a whole biosynthetic pathway by
cloning many genes into rice endosperm (Ye 2000).
While there have been some successes, some traits are harder to engineer
than others. Despite the creation of insect-resistant plants, plants
with disease-resistance have been harder to create. Conferring disease
resistance involves introducing genes that specifically recognize
an invading pathogen. These genes have been shown to be ineffective,
as pathogens have quickly evolved mechanisms to evade them. There
is hope, however, that in the future introducing genes that target
molecules essential to the pathogen will be more effective (Stuiver
2001). Ongoing research in other areas continues, with the advent
of GMOs that produce polymers and pharmaceuticals not far off (Gachet
1999).
Debate Over the Use of Genetically Modified Plants
With their diverse
applications, geneticallly modified plants could greatly benefit society.
However, it is important to note that some believe they could also
harm society. The same antibiotic-resistance marker genes scientists
use to select for genetically modified cells, if present in food products,
could spread to pathogens in the body. These pathogens would then
have antibiotic resistance, making them harder to kill with traditional
medicines.
Another potential harm comes from engineering herbicide resistance
genes into plants. If these genes spread to wild, competing plant
populations, they could create so-called "superweeds," unable
to be killed by herbicides. Introducing insect-resistance genes could
also be dangerous, as some data indicates that they can kill non-harmful
insects, causing a potential change in the distribution of insect
species in a given ecosystem.
Genetically modified plants can potentially harm more than just crop
yields and insect populations. We do not conclusively know if humans
who carry allergies to certain types of plants, like peanut allergies,
would be allergic to food products containing inserted genes from
an allergen. If they were allergic, extensive labeling or other methods
would be needed to ensure their safety. So far, experimental evidence
to date in all these areas lends support to both those who believe
genetically modified plants are harmful and those who believe they
are beneficial. Ultimately more studies need to be conducted to weigh
these and other risks against the potential benefits of genetically
modified plants (Ferber 1999).
Summary
The use of biochemical
techniques has allowed foreign genes to be introduced into plants.
Fundamentally, this involves recombinant DNA techniques and integration
of genes mediated by the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
Different vectors can be used to accomplish this transfer, but all
of them must include a pair of repeating 25-base boundary sequences
found in A. tumefaciens. The DNA between these sequences,
T-DNA, is transferred into the plant genome, where it can later
be expressed. Polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis
can determine the success of the gene transfer by using primers
to mark genes or other known sequences within the T-DNA. PCR is
also used as a detection technique to determine if a plant is transgenic,
aiding the understanding of the natural spread of transgenic crops
in the wild.
Suggested Reading
Alberts,
B., et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell: Third Edition. New
York: Garland, 1994
Davey, M.R., E.L. Rech, B.J. Mulligan. "Direct DNA transfer to
plant cells." Plant Mol. Biol. 133 (1989): 273-285.
Ferber, D. "Risks and benefits: GM crops in the cross hairs."
Science. 286(1999): 1662-1666.
Gachet, E., G.G. Martin, F. Vigneau et al. "Detection of genetically
modified organisms (GMOs) by PCR: a brief review of methodologies
available." Trends in Food Science and Technology. 9 (1999):
380-388.
Griffiths, A.J.F., J.H. Miller, D.T. Suzuki, et al. An Introduction
to Genetic Analysis: Seventh Edition. New York: W.H. Freeman,
2000
Hamilton, C., A. Frary, C. Lewis et al. "Stable transfer of intact
high molecular weight DNA into plant chromosomes." Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA. 93(1996): 9975-9979.
Hennegan, K.P., K.J. Danna. "pBIN20: An improved binary vector
for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation." Plant Mol.
Biol. Reporter. 16(1998): 129-131.
Horsch, R.B., J.E. Fry, N. Hoffman et al. "A simple and general
method for transferring genes into plants." Science. 227(1985):
1229-1231.
Kishore, G.M., C.R., Somerville. "Genetic engineering of commercially
useful biosynthetic pathways in transgenic plants." Curr.
Opin. Biotechnol. 4(1993): 152-158.
Moffat, A.S. "Toting up the early harvest of transgenic plants."
Science. 282(1998): 2176-2178.
Quist, D., I.H. Chapela. "Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional
maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico." Nature. 414(2001):
541-543.
Schell, J. "Transgenic plants as tools to study the molecular
organization of plant genes." Science. 237(1987): 1176-1183.
Stuiver, M.H., J.H.H.V. Custers. "Engineering disease resistance
in plants." Nature. 411(2001): 865-868.
Van Attikum, H., P. Bundock, P. J. J. Hooykaas. "Non-homologous
end-joining proteins are required for Agrobacterium T-DNA integration."
EMBO. 20(2001): 6550-6558.
Voet, D., J.G. Voet, and C.W. Pratt. Fundamentals of Biochemistry:
Upgrade Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2001
Walden, R. and J. Schell. "Techniques in plant molecular biology
- progress and problems." Eur. J. Biochem. 192(1990):
563-576.
Ye, X., et. al. "Engineering the provitamin A (ß-carotene)
biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm."
Science. 287(2000): 303-305.
Journal
of Young Investigators. 2002. Volume Five.
Copyright © 2002 by Vikram Pattanayak and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|