|
|
Issue 4, January 2002
Choosing an Undergraduate Research Mentor
Dr. Reginald Halaby
Montclair State University
halabyr@mail.montclair.edu
Dr. Halaby is
an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biology & Molecular
Biology at Montclair State University in Upper Montclair, NJ. His
research interests include studying lysosomal enzyme-induced apoptosis
of human breast cancer cells. Dr. Halaby is an Undergraduate Advising
Coordinator for the Department.
For prospective student researchers, choosing a faculty mentor is
often one of the most daunting tasks that they undertake. This decision
can be complicated for a number of reasons. Some faculty members
do not project themselves as being approachable or accessible to
students. These faculty often view student-inclusive research as
being a chore rather than a great learning opportunity for both
mentor and mentee. Secondly, students usually do not receive a seminar
or workshop where they are taught the criteria for choosing a suitable
mentor. Lastly, students often have the perception that if they
did not have a course with a professor, they cannot perform research
with that person. This last assumption is not true at all.
The mentor should have a track record of having previously worked
with student researchers. It is advisable to ascertain the mentor's
expectations of his or her research assistants. The student can
accomplish this by asking the prospective mentor a few specific
questions. Does the mentor give students a reasonable timeframe
within which to complete their research projects? Are the research
projects that are available in the mentor's laboratory suitable
for undergraduates (i.e., projects that do not have overly-ambitious
aims)? Can students undertake the research project given their heavy
course loads, employment outside of school, or family commitments?
Is the mentor willing to help students troubleshoot and solve technical
problems, or does he or she merely send students to the library
on a futile search? Does the mentor offer co-authorship to student
researchers? Are students who work with the faculty member encouraged
to publish or present their results (the mentor should train the
students to become proficient in data collection and analysis) and
to attend regional and national conferences? Does the mentor mandate
that people in his or her laboratory work on weekends (if yes, some
weekends, or every weekend)?
Students should also interview prospective mentors and their current
and former student researchers. This will allow students to determine
which faculty member's research interests best conform to their
own research goal(s). In addition, students should determine whether
the mentor will have enough time to devote to student researchers.
It would also be useful to know the professor's teaching load for
a given semester. The following duties can compete for and consume
much of a scientist's time: serving on committees, administrative
duties (e.g., being chair of a department), writing grant proposals,
editing a journal, and teaching at another institution.
Talking with past and present student researchers can also reveal
some favorable information. Students are more likely to tell another
student the actual events that transpire in the laboratory. For
instance, current or past student researchers can relate how long
it actually took them to complete their thesis projects, and what
the research environment in the lab was like.
Unfortunately, in some research settings, student researchers are
treated as just an extra pair of hands, and are not engaged in acquiring
practical and enlightening research skills. These students are relegated
to performing the most mundane chores: they fill carboys, proofread
manuscripts, or call in the orders for the lab. Typically, the mentor
will not disclose any of the above factors to the prospective student
researcher. This further exemplifies how important it is to talk
to students who work with or have worked with the mentor.
Since undergraduate student researchers have to perform well academically
to be competitive candidates for graduate and professional schools,
it is advisable for them to seek a mentor who can also serve as
their academic advisor. You must feel comfortable enough with the
mentor to discuss your long-range career goals with him or her.
Working together with the advisor, you can chart out an appropriate
academic plan that will allow you to complete your graduation requirements
in a timely fashion, and that will best prepare you for your intended
career choices.
Having a positive and supportive mentor-student researcher relationship
will have a lasting effect on a student. Those who have had good
mentors tend to become excellent mentors in their own careers. Invest
the time to do your homework and investigations before you decide
on a mentor, and you will certainly reap the benefits.
Journal
of Young Investigators. 2002. Volume Five.
Copyright © 2002 by Reginald Halaby and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|