|
|
Issue 1, June 2001
From the Bomb to Bio-conservation: The US Govt's Evolving
Role in Science Research
Eleanor Hynes and Andrew Cordiale
State University of New York at Stony Brook
The
United States Federal budget currently provides more than 20 billion
dollars of support towards hundreds of "general science"
related programs and institutions. Many of these programs are implemented
by cabinet level agencies, such as the Department of Energy. The
Department of Energy (DOE), among its many responsibilities, coordinates
the activities of the nine National Laboratories and more than a
dozen specialized laboratories that are located across the country.
Nobel Prize-winning contributions to health care, energy development
and environmental research are just a few of the major advancements
made at these labs. While agencies like the DOE have provided an
invaluable service to the nation and have forwarded science research
exponentially, their controversial history reads as captivatingly
as any dramatic work of fiction.
The U.S. Department of Energy has its roots in an unlikely place,
The Manhattan Project, the code name of the research and
development of the atomic bomb that was dropped on Japan during
World War II. In August of 1939, Albert Einstein and a number of
scientists wrote a letter to President Roosevelt explaining the
efforts of Nazi Germany to purify a type of uranium, U-235, which
could be used to create a nuclear weapon. Combined with the knowledge
that German scientists had invented a fission bomb in 1938, the
project was started to create a nuclear device for the U.S. military.
In 1942, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers established the Manhattan
Engineer District to manage the project. The code name Manhattan
Project was used because the majority of the early research
was conducted in New York. Vannevar Bush, head of the National Defense
Research Committee and the Office Of Development and Scientific
Research, first headed the project. After Bush, General Leslie Groves
was put in charge. General Groves purchased sites at Oak Ridge,
Tennessee and Hanford, Washington to build the necessary facilities
to separate certain types of uranium and plutonium. He appointed
physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer as director of a new weapons laboratory.
It was built on a mesa at Los Alamos, New Mexico. Both the Oak Ridge
and Los Alamos laboratories are still operational, as well as the
Hanford-based laboratory, now called Pacific Northwest. They are
three of the nine current Department of Energy National Laboratories.
The Project began with a budget of $6,000, which soon grew to over
$2 million. During early work on the device at Los Alamos, the bomb
was referred to as "the gadget" in lectures, so that civilian
construction workers who were completing the unfinished laboratory
buildings would not hear the word "bomb." Finally, in
1945, the atomic bomb was constructed. It was dropped on Hiroshima
on August 6, 1945.
Following the war, Congress engaged in a vigorous and contentious
debate over whether civilians or the military should control the
atomic weapon capabilities. To end the debate, Congress passed an
act that formed the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) to foster and
control the peacetime development of atomic science and technology.
President Harry S. Truman signed the Atomic Energy Act on August
1, 1946, transferring the control of atomic energy from military
to civilian hands. This action reflected America's postwar optimism,
with Congress declaring that atomic energy should be employed not
only in the Nation's defense, but also to promote world peace, improve
the public welfare and to strengthen free competition in private
enterprise. The signing was the culmination of long months of intensive
debate among politicians, military planners and atomic scientists
over the fate of this new energy source. The heated debate, however,
was only partially satiated by the addition of both a military and
civilian advisory board to oversee the Commission. Oppenheimer chaired
the Civilian Advisory Board from 1946-1952, and after witnessing
the destructive capabilities of this technology, was adamantly opposed
to the making of the hydrogen bomb. It is alleged that numerous
military officials were not satisfied with the disclosure of atomic
"secrets" to civilians, or Oppenheimer's strong opposition
to continued development of the H-bomb and other nuclear devices.
On December 23, 1953, a letter notified Dr. Oppenheimer that his
security clearance had been suspended. He was furnished a list of
items of derogatory information and was advised of his rights to
a hearing under AEC procedures. On March 4, 1954, Dr. Oppenheimer
requested that he be afforded a hearing. The AEC became the center
of a nation-wide controversy as a result of Oppenheimer's suspension,
on the alleged grounds that he was a security risk. He was charged
with numerous counts of association with Communist organizations
and was condemned by the House Committee on Un-American Activities,
chaired by Sen. Joseph McCarthy. At Oppenheimer's hearing before
the AEC Board, he was charged as a Communist sympathizer, and it
was alleged that his opposition to the development of the H-bomb
delayed its development because of his substantial influence in
the scientific community. Oppenheimer himself testified, "I
felt perhaps quite wrongly that having played an active part in
promoting a revolution in warfare, I needed to be as responsible
as I could with regard to what came of this revolution." The
Board concluded specifically that Dr. Oppenheimer was a "loyal
American citizen", however, his alleged Communist associations
and stance on the future of atomic weaponry deemed reinstatement
of his security clearance impossible, as decided by a 4 to 1 vote.
Despite the controversy surrounding Oppenheimer, the Atomic Energy
Commission began many useful and necessary projects for the nation.
The National Laboratory system was established from the facilities
created under the Manhattan Project, and Argonne National Laboratory
was one of the first laboratories authorized under this legislation
as a contractor-operated facility dedicated to fulfilling the new
Commission's mission. Atomic research, however, was used mainly
for military purposes in the years following, and during the early
Cold War years, the Commission focused on designing and producing
nuclear weapons and on developing nuclear reactors for naval propulsion.
Up until 1954, the use of atomic research and energy was a government-restricted
program, in order to limit the use of nuclear intelligence by civilians
and enemy regimes. The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ended exclusive
government use of the atomic research, and began the growth of the
commercial nuclear power industry, giving the Atomic Energy Commission
authority to regulate the new industry. The extended energy crisis
of the 1970s demonstrated the need for unified energy organization
and planning. The Department of Energy, activated on October 1,
1977, assumed the responsibilities of the Federal Energy Administration,
the Energy Research and Development Administration, the Federal
Power Commission and parts and programs of several other agencies.
Ironically, the focus of the Department of Energy has shifted to
mend mistakes made in its own missions over the years. The Department's
research during the 1970's and 80's focused mainly on nuclear military
development and on energy concerns, reflecting the tense climate
of the Cold War. In the past decade, this focus has shifted to environmental
issues, including cleaning up nuclear waste and decimated lands.
In essence, the Department is trying to undo the damage caused by
the nuclear testing of its predecessors. This is a reflection of
the peacetime atmosphere and the environmental focus of the nation
and commercial industries. The Department of Energy, through the
decades, has evolved from a project to create death and destruction
through nuclear weaponry, to one that supports research and development
of live-saving devices and medical breakthroughs. This evolution
is but one facet of the Federal government's ever-changing role
in scientific research.
Journal
of Young Investigators. 2001. Volume Four.
Copyright © 2001 by Eleanor Hynes and Andrew Cordiale and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|