|
|
Issue 2, April 2001
JYI Feature Science Article Reviewer: Patricia J. Watson, Chasing the White Rabbit
Mary Patyten
JYI Features Editor
patyten@jyi.org
JYI recently welcomed Patricia J. Watson to the journal as one
of our Feature Article Reviewers. She is a medical editor for Sandler
and Recht Communications, a marketing agency specializing in pharmaceutical
clients. Trish also works with Oxford University Press, where she
specializes in editing science manuscripts, and volunteers her time
as a board member and web administrator for Carolina Wren Press,
a nonprofit publisher specializing in works underrepresented in
mainstream publishing.
We
at JYI could not contain our curiosity when we learned that Trish
Watson, one of our new Feature Article Reviewers from the professional
science writing community, had attempted to start an online journal
for undergraduate research as part of her master's
thesis. What was it that led Trish, then a technical communication
graduate student and research assistant at North
Carolina State's Center for Communication in Science, Technology
and Management to start an online, undergraduate research journal?
Trish Watson,
JYI Feature Article Reviewer |
According to Trish,
it seemed like a good idea. (We at JYI agree!) When she approached
faculty and students with her plan to publish an electronic journal
of superior undergraduate research, they were enthusiastic about the
opportunity to showcase undergraduate work. Yet, in the end, only
two submissions were ever published by the NCSU
Student Researcher, a fact that Trish attributes to targeting
students as their main audience and to marketing to these students
under the assumption that they were the motivating force that could
make or break the journal.
Her analysis of the project for her master's thesis showed that, in
fact, university faculty members were the motivators that she had
not included in her equation. Trish believes that if NCSU faculty
had received some reward or recognition for having their students
publish, or if professors had required or encouraged their students
to publish, faculty may have provided the push needed to fill the
journal with great undergraduate papers. There were also problems
with perceptions of whether or not it was appropriate to publish undergraduate
work. "Students aren't authors," was a common theme Trish
met during analysis of her project. Plus, a "Writing Across the
Curriculum" initiative had caused many faculty members to rethink
what they considered ‘excellent' writing, and so publicly nominating
a paper as ‘excellent' might have been problematic at that time.
"So, you could really say that the principle behind JYI is near
and dear to my heart: giving students practice, giving students a
showcase for excellent work, preparing them for being on the forefront
for the communication challenges of the future, and providing a platform
for experimentation that could conceivably contribute to the entire
system of research communication in its ever-changing history,"
Trish said recently. "The history of science communication makes
this evolution clearly inevitable!"
How does Trish feel about JYI's chances, given the fate of her own
journal? "After analyzing my own unsuccessful, single-university
undergraduate research publication, it is quite clear to me that a
publication with an international base has a good chance of making
a go of it, and I'm happy to help in that endeavor just as much as
I would have been happy to continue working with the NCSU Student
Researcher had it taken off," she said.
The course that Trish Watson took to the science communication field
is as unlikely as the route Alice took in pursuit of the White Rabbit
in Alice in Wonderland. Raised by two scientists, she grew
up steeped in the scientific method, but decided in her teens to pursue
a career as an artist. After high school graduation from the North
Carolina School of the Arts in Winston-Salem, she tried pursuing life
as a potter. Finding that difficult at the young age of sixteen, she
began her undergraduate career at a local community college and then
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, first studying creative
writing (but seeing no future in it), then political science (a pursuit
too fraught with politicians for her liking), and finally ending up
as a chemistry major. She took two years of what she terms "hard-core
science and mathematics" before she realized that she really
had no interest in working in a lab for the rest of her life, either.
It was at this point that Trish decided to take a breather and ponder
her destiny. Her turning point came, she says, when she realized that
she would rather read about science than practice it. As with many
science communicators, she rebelled against the restraints of scientific
specialization, being interested in many, if not all, aspects of science.
At this juncture, Carolina Academic Press scooped her up and showed
her that all her interests and talents really did have a focused outlet.
Working as production manager for the Press, she combined all her
interests: artistic, academic, literary and scientific, in producing
scientific publications. She loved it.
With a clearer picture of what she would like to study, Trish went
back to school to get her degree. At North Carolina State University,
she and her advisors designed a multidisciplinary undergraduate major
with emphases in the culture of science and science writing. Her love
of mathematics led her to write an undergraduate honors thesis assessing
the impact of chaos and complexity theory on science and society.
She went on to earn her master's degree in technical communication
at North Carolina State, where she focused on scientific writing,
teaching, and her thesis project, the experimental electronic journal
for undergraduate research.
Trish's belief in the importance of broad-scale science communication
is reflected in a quotation from physicist Werner Heisenberg, which
has hung on her bulletin board at home since she was sixteen years
old: "Even for the physicist, the description in plain language
will be a criterion of the degree of understanding that has been reached."
Without communication, science is worthless, she says, a fact that
has rung true for her throughout her studies of the history of science.
What motivated Trish to volunteer as a JYI Science Feature Article
Reviewer? "Now that I work as an editor in the pharmaceutical
world, I want to keep my hand in education, online publishing and
research writing," she says. "JYI is an excellent way to
do all three at once."
Trish also has some very definite recommendations for undergraduates
who want to enter the science communication field. She strongly suggests
getting an undergraduate degree in one of the sciences, then pursuing
writing. No matter what field science students end up in, she says,
their writing skills will be highly prized.
Trish firmly believes that experience is the best teacher when it
comes to writing. Write and publish as many articles as possible,
she suggests. Write all that you can, and save all that you do - and
remember that electronic experience is extremely good to have.
Journal
of Young Investigators. 2001. Volume Three.
Copyright © 2001 by Mary Patyten and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|