|
|
Issue 1, March 2001
Nicotine Patches: What Quitters Use to Win
Wendy Chan
Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University
This article was based on research Wendy did during
Summer 2000, when she participated in the Center for Polymer Interfaces and
Macromolecular Assemblies Summer Undergraduate Research Experience at Stanford
University. For her project, she investigated the adhesive properties of
transdermal drug delivery systems.
The
teenage years are a susceptible time for experimentation, when peer
pressure to look cool and light up begins an addiction that is difficult
to overcome. Fortunately, societal pressures to quit smoking are
more overwhelming now than ever before. Increasing awareness of
the hazardous health effects of second-hand smoke on nonsmokers
has been a cause for concern in the nonsmoking community; consequently,
businesses have been pressured to take action. Airlines, restaurants,
and workplaces either limit smoking to designated smoking areas
or ban it entirely. As much pressure as there is to quit, it is
just not that easy.
According to the
American Cancer Society, of the 17 million Americans that try quitting
each year, only 1.3 million actually succeed.3 The rest
cannot escape the grasp of nicotine - the powerful ingredient in
cigarettes found to be addictive by the Surgeon General in 1988.3
The withdrawal effects that accompany the nicotine craving include
irritability, anger, anxiety, restlessness, hunger, and the inability
to concentrate. 3,7 Normal functioning is completely
disrupted; psychological, physiological, and behavioral effects
are all represented by these symptoms.
There are, however,
weapons available on the market to help make the battle to quit
smoking easier. The newest product is the nicotine patch, which
looks like a Band-Aid but is much more sophisticated. It delivers
small doses of nicotine to the bloodstream, so that a constant low
level of nicotine is maintained in the body.7 This is
intended to satisfy the nicotine craving without the pleasurable
"buzz" that comes from smoking. Tablets provide an addictive
"buzz" since they immediately supply a high level of the
drug to the bloodstream.4 It is both easy and tempting
for patients to take more than the recommended dose of tablets,
unlike nicotine patches, which give patients minimal control over
their nicotine intake. Furthermore, the patch's automatic delivery
of nicotine to the body permits the smoker to focus on overcoming
the physical habits that go hand in hand with smoking. These include
"having something in the hand or mouth, drawing smoke in and
puffing it out, or reaching for a cigarette in response to a behavioral
cue, such as a cup of coffee or stress."3
The nicotine patch
essentially uses a transdermal drug delivery system. The main concept
behind the patch is that liquids in direct contact with the skin
can be absorbed to some degree.4 The two main delivery
systems are the membrane-controlled and the matrix systems; schematics
of both are shown below.6
| Backing
Layer |
| Drug
Reservoir |
| Rate-Controlling
Membrane |
| Adhesive
|
Membrane-controlled System |
|
Matrix-controlled System |
The membrane-controlled
system consists of four layers: the backing layer, the drug reservoir,
the rate-controlling membrane, and the adhesive. The drug reservoir
stores the nicotine and liquid excipients that encourage skin absorption
of the drug.6 The drug diffuses through the membrane
in uniform amounts and then passes through the adhesive before reaching
the skin. The drug release rate is constant, so it must be maintained
at a level below the skin's saturation limit.1 For the
matrix system, the adhesive serves the dual roles of the adhesive
and drug reservoir. In this design, the drug is delivered to maintain
skin saturation.1 Hence, the drug diffusivity is dependent
on the skin's absorption rate. When the drug level in the patch
falls below the saturation limit, the rate of drug delivery will
gradually diminish over time.
Both the membrane-controlled
and the matrix systems allow nicotine to exist in the bloodstream
at a small but constant level over a long period of time, unlike
oral therapy which has a "peak and valley" effect.2
Oral drug delivery via tablets is not sophisticated enough to provide
controlled drug release; each dose quickly raises the drug concentration
in the bloodstream to its maximum level and then plummets. At high
concentration levels, there is a risk of harmful side effects, but
at the other extreme, the concentration is so low that the patient
derives no medical benefit. Hence, "it is desirable to release
drugs at a constant rate, thereby maintaining drug concentration
within the therapeutic range and eliminating the need for frequent
dosages."5
Transdermal drug
delivery systems hold a gold mine of promise in the medical field;
nevertheless, typical of all young developments, a number of shortcomings
in their performance need to be addressed. First, a smaller and
less conspicuous design that still maximizes skin coverage is desired
to increase comfort so that the activity of the patient is not inhibited.
Second, adhesive failure occurs when the skin becomes wet or sweaty,
which poses serious problems during exercise or bathing since many
patch designs require 24 hour wear. The greatest shortcoming is
the difficult removal of the patch, resulting in skin irritation.6
Consequently, research is underway to optimize the nicotine patch
so that smokers have a reliable and effective aid to battle their
addiction.
Suggested Reading
1 Allen, Beth,
Evan Goldberg, Sabrina Piercy, and Casey Rinehart. (1997) Transdermal
Drug Delivery. Student Project on Controlled Drug Delivery. http://www.eos.ncsu.edu/bae/research/blanchard/www/465/textbook/otherprojects/drugDeliver_97/TD_DDS.html
2 Cygnus, Inc.
(1997) Drug Delivery Products. http://www.cygn.com/drugdelivery.html
3 Lewis, Ricki,
Ph.D. (2000) Products to Help Smokers Quit. Department of Health
and Human Services. http://www.wellweb.com.SMOKING/SMPATCH.HTM
4 Medinfo. Arboris
Ltd. (2000) http://www.medinfo.co.uk/drugs/nicotinepatches.html
5 Thrash, Todd.
(1995) Controlled-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Mechanisms of Intestinal-Specific
Polymeric Degradation. The Journal of The Denison Chemical Society.
http://www.denison.edu/chem/DCS/journal/thrashv1n1.shtml
6 Venkatraman,
Subbu and Robert Gale. (1998) Skin adhesives and skin adhesion Transdermal
drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 19: 1119-1136.
7 WebMD Corporation
(2000) http://health.excite.com/content/article/1677.56788
Journal
of Young Investigators. 2001. Volume Three.
Copyright © 2001 by Wendy Chan and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|