Journal of Young Investigators
    Undergraduate, Peer-Reviewed Science Journal
Volume Three
    RESEARCH ARTICLE
RECENT ISSUES | ARCHIVES | RESOURCES | JYI NEWS | ABOUT JYI 
Issue 1, March 2001

Biological & Biomedical Sciences
Two Main Control Elements are Responsible for the Activation of the Murine Interleukin 12 p40 Promoter: Studies Reveal C/EBPb and C/EBPd To Have Trans-Activation Functions

Steven E. Zaki
University of California at Los Angeles
Advisor: Stephen T. Smale, Ph.D.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UCLA School of Medicine

Abstract

The heterodimeric cytokine Interleukin 12 (IL-12) is critical for T-helper 1 responses. The gene encoding the IL-12 p40 subunit is induced in macrophages following exposure to bacterial products. This study provides a functional analysis of the p40 promoter control elements in the murine macrophage cell lines RAW 264.7 and J774. Results show that two immune response associated transcription factors, C/EBPb and C/EBPd, are induced by lipopolysaccharide in these cell lines. The most critical cis-acting element is located between positions -96 and -88 relative to the transcription start site. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays reveal LPS-inducible functional binding of both in vitro and cell line produced C/EBPb and C/EBPd to the critical element. In vitro transcription/translation of the putative control elements suggest the heterodimer C/EBPb (LAP)/C/EBPb (LIP) to function in vivo. In addition, transient transfection assays show the C/EBPb isoform LAP to activate transcription of the IL-12 p40 promoter, while C/EBPb (LIP) shows transcriptional inhibition. The results suggest that C/EBP proteins play critical roles in the bacterial induction of the IL-12 p40 promoter.

Introduction

The cytokine Interleukin 12 (IL-12) is synthesized by macrophages upon exposure to bacterial products and intracellular pathogens. A main function of IL-12 is to mediate the signalling for differentiation of effecter T-helper 1 (Th1) cells and to secrete the Th1 cytokines, IL-2 and IFN-g (29). Th1 cells take part in cell-mediated immunity associated with intracellular microbes (1, 17). IL-12 has been shown to generate a Th1 response against human pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (32), Mycobacterium leprae (25), and Leishmania species (19), and during the pathogenesis of the human immunodeficiency virus (5, 6, 7). Because of the role of IL-12 in the pathogen-induced immune response, its expression may be important for the development of vaccines against several intracellular pathogens (2). While the induction of IL-12 by intracellular pathogens instigates the protective host Th1 response, overexpression of Th1 cytokines and IL-12 may take part in the formation of chronic autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (24). Thus, an elucidation of macrophage expression of IL-12 may supply information concerning the pathogenesis of infectious and inflammatory diseases and may aid in the development of novel approaches for manipulation of the immune response.

Two covalently linked glycosylated chains, p40 and p35, constitute the IL-12 heterodimer. The subunits are encoded by distinct genes and together make up the biologically active p70 heterodimer (13, 21, 31). The p35 gene is induced in several tissues (13). p40 is strongly induced by intracellular bacteria and bacterial products (8) and its mRNA is found in macrophages and other cells that synthesize IL-12 (13).

This paper presents the results of a functional analysis of the murine IL-12 p40 promoter in the RAW 264.7 and J774 cell lines. The study implicates two main control elements involved in LPS-induced promoter activity. Both C/EBPb and C/EBPd show significant nuclear induction by lipopolysaccharide. The two transcription factors also show selective binding of the IL-12 p40 promoter in vitro. In vitro expression and electrophoretic mobiliy shift assays provide evidence that the precise heterodimeric element responsible for activation of p40 may be composed of C/EBPb (LAP) and C/EBPb (LIP) subunits. In addition, overexpression of C/EBPb (LAP) causes for increased transcription of the IL-12 p40 promoter in transient transfection assays, while overexpression of C/EBPb (LIP) results in decreased transcription. These findings aid in the exposition of the principle mechanisms involved in the regulation of this important cytokine.

Materials and Methods

Nuclear extracts and DNA binding assays

The method of Dignam et al. (10) as previously described (14) was used to prepare RAW 264.7 nuclear extracts with the following modifications: 1 µg of aprotinin (Sigma) per ml, 0.5 µg of leupeptin (Sigma) per ml, 1 µM pepstatin (Sigma), and 1mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma). Annealed single-stranded oligonucleotides with 5' GATC overhangs (Operon) that were gel purified were used to make electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) probes. The Klenow enzyme was used to fill in two hundred nanograms of probe with [a-32P]dGTP and [a-32P]dCTP. A NucTrap purification column (Stratagene) was used to purify the labeled probes. Wild-type IL-12 p40 EMSA probe sequence is displayed below (see Fig. 4A). Binding for C/EBP EMSAs was optimized at room temperature for 45 min, and EMSA products were separated on 5% acrylamide-1ī Tris-glycine-EDTA gel run at 4oC for 3 h at 150 V. 2 µl of antibody was added to extracts for supershift experiments, in addition to poly (dI-dC) and binding buffer 30 minutes prior to addition of labeled probe at room temperature. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. supplied polyclonal antibodies. Kodak X-AR 5 film was used to expose dried gels at -80oC with an intensifying screen.


Cell lines and reagents

Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) (assayed for low endotoxin activity) was utilized to maintain the RAW 264.7 and J774 murine macrophage lines (American Type Culture Collection). LPS was obtained from Sigma Chemicals.


Plasmids

pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene) was used to isolate a 10kb murine IL-12 p40 genomic clone. DNA sequencing and restriction mapping was employed to determine the location of the promoter region and intron-exon structure. The sequence of one kilobase of the promoter region was determined (Sequenase, version 2) and was found to match that previously published (18). Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assay p40 promoters were cloned from pGL2B into pCAT basic (Promega) modified to contain a KpnI site and a BglII site in the polylinker. C/EBPb isoforms LIP (pSCT-LAP with a deleted NcoI fragment) and LAP (pSCT-LAP) expression plasmids containing a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter/enhancer were originally constructed by Patrick Descombes and Uelie Schibler (9) and were obtained from Andrew Henderson and Kathryn Calame. An endotoxin-free plasmid purification system (Qiagen) was used to purify all plasmids used in transient transfections.


Transfections

A previously described protocol (26) was employed with modifications to transiently transfect RAW 264.7 cells by electroporation. For CAT transfections, 7.5 x 106 cells were suspended in 200 µl of DMEM with 10% FBS plus 20 µg of CAT plasmid and 1 µg of HSP-b -galactosidase reporter (provided by Bradley Cobb, UCLA). Cells were electroporated in a 0.4-mm-long cuvette (Bio-Rad) in a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser at 250 V and 960 µF. The cells were incubated for 10 min at room temperature and were washed with 5 ml of PBS and resuspended in 1 ml of DMEM. Each transfection product was divided into two 500-µl aliquots, and each was diluted to 2.5 ml with medium in a six-well plate. 50 µg of total protein from cell extracts were used to perform CAT assays, as per the Promega protocol. A PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) was employed to quantitate the conversion of [14C]chloramphenicol to its acetylated forms.

Results

C/EBPb and C/EBPd are induced by lipopolysaccharide in the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7

An immunoblot assay utilizing anti-C/EBPb antibody reveals no protein in either the unactivated or LPS-activated cytoplasm (Fig. 1A, lanes 1 and 2). Basal levels of C/EBPb are seen in the unactivated nucleus (lane 3), and the protein is upregulated in the LPS-activated nucleus (lane 4). Previous findings have described C/EBPb as capable of activating the IL-12 p40 promoter upon LPS exposure (9). An upregulation of C/EBPb induced by LPS may be necessary for C/EBPb to exert its effects on the p40 promoter. C/EBPd is not present in the cytoplasm or in the unactivated nucleus (Fig. 1B, lanes 1-3), but protein levels are significantly induced in the LPS-activated nucleus (lane 4). The precise role of C/EBPd in the immune regulation cascade has yet to be elucidated. However, upregulation of the protein in response to lipopolysaccharide suggests C/EBPd to play some role in the LPS-induced regulation process. C/EBPa is not present in the unactivated or LPS-activated cytoplasm or nucleus of the RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line (Fig. 1C). Lack of upregulation of C/EBPa does not necessarily exclude the possibility that it is a member of the immune regulation system, (since a post-translational modification of endogenous C/EBPa may be sufficient for activation).



Figure 1. C/EBPb and C/EBPd are induced by lipopolysaccharide in the RAW 264.7 and J774 murine macrophage cell lines. (A) An immunoblot assay was performed with cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts from unactivated RAW 264.7 cells and from cells activated with LPS (5 µg/ml) for 4 h. 6 µg of extract was hybridized at room temperature with anti-C/EBPb primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h, and then with secondary antibody for 1 h. The hybridization complexes were treated with ECL reaction for 1 min, and were exposed to film. (B) Similar immunoblot assay hybridizing with anti-C/EBPd primary antibody. (C) Similar mmunoblot assay using anti-C/EBPa antibody. (D-F) Immunoblot assays using the same respective methods as described in A-C, with J774 cells as the source of cytoplasmic and nuclear extract.


C/EBPb and C/EBPd are induced by lipopolysaccharide in the J774 murine macrophage cell line

Consistent with the results obtained in the RAW 264.7 cell line, C/EBPb is produced at a basal level in the nucleus and is upregulated upon exposure of the cells to lipopolysaccharide (Fig. 1D, lanes 3 and 4). Similar results in the J774 cell line confirm that the findings in the RAW 264.7 cells are not specific for this cell line, and may implicate C/EBPb as a universal response element in the immune regulation cascade. Also consistent with findings in the RAW 264.7 cell line is the upregulation of C/EBPd in J774 cells (Fig. 1E). Again, the protein is completely absent from cytoplasmic and unactivated nuclear extracts (lanes 1-3) and significant production of protein is observed in the activated nucleus (lane 4). Immunoblot results for C/EBPa are analogous to those in RAW 264.7 cells, and reveal no protein in the unactivated or activated cytoplasmic or nuclear extracts (Figure 1F, lanes 1-4).


The C/EBPb (LAP) isoform homodimer is larger than the C/EBPd homodimer

Previous studies have described the presence of two distinctly translated forms of C/EBPb, LAP, which is larger, and LIP, smaller (9). Functionally, LIP has been shown to bind to the LAP binding site on DNA and serve as an inhibitor due to its lack of a transcriptional activation domain (9). EMSA experiments have revealed 3 complexes associated with C/EBPb, the fastest-migrating complex being composed of LIP homodimers, the intermediate complex containing LIP-LAP heterodimers, and the slowest-migrating complex composed of LAP homodimers. The LAP and LIP proteins are further able to heterodimerize with other proteins (e.g. LAP is able to heterodimerize with C/EBPa and C/EBPd). To determine the precise heterodimeric partners responsible for activation of the IL-12 p40 promoter, in vitro expressed C/EBPb (LAP), C/EBPb (LIP), and C/EBPd were combinatorially incubated, and the resulting dimerization products were run in EMSA experiments utilizing a radioactive probe consisting of the p40 promoter (see below). Previous experiments have shown both C/EBPb (LAP) and C/EBPd to be similar in size. An immunoblot assay using these proteins expressed in vitro was performed to distinguish between C/EBPb (LAP) and C/EBPd based on electrophoretic mobility. Results reveal that the C/EBPb (LAP) homodimer has slower mobility on the poly-acrylamide gel (Fig. 2A, lane 5). C/EBPd shows slightly higher mobility (lane 1). The C/EBPb (LIP) homodimer is significantly smaller than either of the above mentioned proteins, and runs to a lower position on the gel (lane 6).



Figure 2. The transcription activator of the IL-12 p40 promoter may be a C/EBPb (LAP)/C/EBPb (LIP) heterodimer. (A) An immunoblot assay was performed with in vitro transcribed/translated presumptive IL-12 p40 activators. 6 µg of protein was incubated with C/EBPb and C/EBPd primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h, and then with secondary antibody for 1 h. An ECL reaction was performed and the complexes were exposed to film. (B) An EMSA was performed with nuclear extracts from unactivated RAW 264.7 cells (lane 1) and from cells activated with LPS (5 µg/ml) for 4 h (lane 2), and with in vitro transcribed/translated presumptive IL-12 p40 transcription activators (lanes 3-8). Labeled probe was incubated with 6 µg of protein and 2 µg of poly (dI-dC) at room temperature for 45 min, and electrophoresis followed.



The transcription activator of the IL-12 p40 promoter may be a C/EBPb (LAP)/C/EBPb (LIP) heterodimer

An EMSA experiment was employed using lanes consisting of J774 cell line nuclear extracts and in vitro expressed presumptive IL-12 p40 promoter transcription factors. Protein mixtures were incubated with a radioactively labeled DNA oligonucleotide probe consisting of the IL-12 p40 promoter. The in vitro expressed C/EBPb (LAP)/C/EBPb (LIP) heterodimer (Fig. 2B, lane 5) runs to a similar position on the acrylamide gel as the principle bands of the J774 unactivated (lane 1) and LPS-activated (lane 2) nuclear extracts. The correspondence in size of the C/EBPb (LAP)/C/EBPb (LIP) heterodimer with the active proteins in the nuclear extract may suggest the presence of this heterodimer as an active transcription factor in vivo. The C/EBPb (LIP)/C/EBPd heterodimer (lane 8) shows similar correspondence in size and may be a secondary contributor to p40 activation. Possible minor contribution may come from C/EBPb (LIP) homodimers (lane 4).


C/EBPb (LAP) is a transcriptional activator of the IL-12 p40 promoter, while C/EBPb (LIP) shows inhibition of transcription

To determine the effects of C/EBPb (LAP) and C/EBPb (LIP) on the IL-12 p40 promoter in RAW 264.7 cells, promoter activity was studied by a transient transfection assay. The IL-12 p40 promoter (containing the -355-to-+55 region) was cloned from pGL2B into a CAT reporter plasmid (pCAT basic; Promega), and transiently transfected into RAW 264.7 cells along with varying amounts of C/EBPb isoform expression plasmidsūLAP (PSCT-LAP) or LIP (PSCT-LAP with a deleted NcoI fragment). To promote overexpression in vivo, each expression plasmid contained a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter/enhancer, a synthetic promoter containing multiple SP1 binding sites upstream of consensus TATA and initiator elements. Overexpression of 0.1 µg of LIP decreased both unactivated and LPS-activated promoter activity by twofold, and 1.0 µg of LIP caused for slightly greater inhibition (Fig. 3). Overexpression of 0.1 µg of LAP increased transcription of the unactivated p40 promoter by nearly fourfold and had a less dramatic effect on LPS-induced transcription. Increased amounts of LAP in LPS-activated cells caused for a decrease in promoter activity possibly due to nonspecific squelching. These results suggest C/EBPb (LIP) to inhibit transcription of the IL-12 p40 promoter and C/EBPb (LAP) to promote transcription.




Figure 3. Effects of overexpressed C/EBPb isoforms LIP and LAP on p40 promoter activity. 15 µg of the -355-to-+55 IL-12 p40 promoter-CAT reporter was cotransfected in transient assays into RAW 264.7 cells with expression plasmids for LAP and LIP (9) containing a CMV promoter/enhancer. The amounts of the LIP and LAP plasmids cotransfected are indicated below the graph. Addition of a CMV promoter/enhancer-luciferase plasmid normalized plasmid amounts to 20 µg per transfection. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were either not activated or were activated with 5 µg of LPS per ml for 24 h.



C/EBPb (LAP) is the primary contributor to binding of IL-12 p40 promoter, with C/EBPd contributing to a smaller degree

A radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide probe spanning the sequence from position -110 to -69 (Fig. 4A) was prepared to elucidate the proteins that bind to the putative C/EBP site between nucleotides -96 and -88 of the murine p40 promoter. An EMSA supershift experiment was performed incubating this probe with unactivated and LPS-activated J774 cell line nuclear extracts and in vitro transcribed/translated C/EBPb (LAP) and C/EBPd. Unactivated nuclear extract incubated with C/EBPb antibody (Fig. 4B, lane 5) shows the presence of a slow-mobility complex and a greatly decreased intensity of the principle active protein double-band. This result implicates C/EBPb present to a substantial degree in the unactivated nuclear extract, and shows that endogenous C/EBPb shows considerable binding to the p40 promoter probe. These results are consistent with previous information suggesting C/EBPb as the principle trans-acting factor inducing expression of the IL-12 p40 promoter (9). The two complexes were strongly induced by LPS (lane 4), further suggesting the role of C/EBPb as a functional component of the lipopolysaccharide-induced immune response. LPS-activated nuclear extract incubated with C/EBPd antibody shows a smaller, yet evident decrease in intensity of the principle active band in both unactivated (lane 3) and LPS-activated (lane 6) nuclear extracts, with LPS-activated extracts again showing inducibility. These results suggest C/EBPd to have a smaller, although still significant functional trans-acting relation to the p40 promoter, and also ascribes to C/EBPd a possible role in LPS-induced p40 regulation. It should be noted that there is a seeming inconsistency in these results in that although the C/EBPd antibody is decreasing the intensity of the principle active band (lane 6) there is no residual band representing C/EBPd in the lane consisting of nuclear extract incubated with C/EBPb antibody (lane 5). This inconsistency can be explained by the fact that the Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti-C/EBPb antibody may bind to both C/EBPb and C/EBPd. To test this hypothesis, in vitro transcribed/translated C/EBPd was incubated with anti-C/EBPb antibody and run on an EMSA gel. The results (lane 11) show that the anti-C/EBPb antibody does bind to C/EBPd by the appearance of a slow-mobility complex and a disappearance of the band representing C/EBPd. The specificity of the anti-C/EBPb antibody for both C/EBPb and C/EBPd misrepresents the results of this EMSA experiment by giving the impression that the principle active double band in the J774 nuclear extract is composed solely of C/EBPb. To obtain a more accurate estimation of the relative amounts of C/EBPb and C/EBPd actually present in these extracts, it was important to resolve the double specific activity of the anti-C/EBPb antibody.



Figure 4. EMSA shows LPS-inducible binding of C/EBPb, and to a smaller degree C/EBPd, to the p40 promoter. (A) Oligonucleotide probe location within the p40 promoter. The thick line represents the probe spanning the putative C/EBP site (-110/-69). The TATA box is indicated by boldfaced letters and the transcription start site is indicated by the arrow. (B) An EMSA was performed with 5 mg of nuclear extract from unactivated (lanes 1-3), LPS-activated (lanes 4-6) cells, and in vitro expressed C/EBPb (lanes 7-9) and C/EBPd (lanes 10-12). 2 mg of poly(dI-dC) and extract were incubated for 30 min at room temperature without (lanes 1, 3, 6, 9) or with 2 ml of the following polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology): anti-C/EBPb (lanes 2, 5, 8, and 11), and anti-C/EBPd (lanes 3, 6, 9, and 12). Subsequent to this incubation, labeled probe -110/-69 was added to the mixture and incubated for 45 min at room temperature prior to electrophoresis.



The specificity of the Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti-C/EBPb antibody for both C/EBPb and C/EBPd is concentration-independent

An EMSA supershift experiment using in vitro expressed C/EBPd incubated with increasing concentrations of anti-C/EBPb antibody (Fig. 5A, lanes 11-15) shows complete binding of the anti-C/EBPb antibody to C/EBPd at antibody levels as low as .25ml. These results show that the specificity of the anti-C/EBPb antibody for C/EBPd is not due to excessive concentrations of the antibody in the assay. The dual specificity of the anti-C/EBPb antibody may be due to flawed commercial preparation of either the primary antigen or the antibody itself. To continue with these experiments it was essential to use an antibody which binds solely to C/EBPb. For this reason, a C/EBPb antigen was prepared and purified in the laboratory and antibody was made against this particular antigen. This specially prepared anti-C/EBPb antibody was used in the following experiment to determine if binding to C/EBPd would be precluded.



Figure 5. EMSAs demonstrate the double specific activity of the Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti-C/EBPb antibody, and the single specificity of the laboratory-prepared anti-C/EBPb antibody. (A) An EMSA was performed with 5 µg of nuclear extract from LPS-activated cells (lanes 1-5) and in vitro expressed C/EBPb (lanes 6-10) and C/EBPd (lanes 11-15). Extract and 2 µg of poly(dI-dC) were incubated for 30 min at room temperature without (lanes 1, 6, and 11) or with (lanes 2-5, 7-10, and 12-15) increasing concentrations of anti-C/EBPb antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Following incubation, labeled probe -110/-69 was added, and incubation proceeded for 45 min at room temperature prior to electrophoresis. (B) A similar EMSA was performed using laboratory-prepared anti-C/EBPb antibody in place of the Santa Cruz Biotechnology stock.

Laboratory-prepared anti-C/EBPb antibody shows specificity only for C/EBPb

An EMSA supershift experiment was performed using LPS-activated J774 cell line nuclear extracts and in vitro expressed C/EBPb and C/EBPd. The lanes consisting of nuclear extract and in vitro expressed C/EBPb (Fig. 5B, lanes 1-10) serve as controls and show expected binding of the putative antibody to proteins present in the incubation. The lanes consisting of in vitro expressed C/EBPd (lanes 11-15) serve as the functional assay, the results of which show quite conclusively the absence of antibody binding at levels as high as 2.0 µl. Its specificity only for C/EBPb confirmed, the laboratory- prepared anti-C/EBPb antibody was used in subsequent experiments in place of the non-specific commercial version.


C/EBPd binds to the IL-12 p40 promoter

An EMSA supershift experiment using J774 nuclear extracts was performed to determine the relative amount of C/EBPd which binds to the p40 probe. The lane consisting of LPS-activated nuclear extract incubated with the specially prepared anti-C/EBPb antibody shows the presence of a light-intensity double band at the same vertical position on the gel as the active bands in the LPS-activated nuclear extract (Fig. 6, compare lanes 8 and 6). This band represents residual levels of C/EBPd bound to the radiolabeled probe. Thus, the specially prepared anti-C/EBPb antibody is able to bind to and shift only the C/EBPb protein and any C/EBPd present in the extract remains at its original position. These results show quite clearly the relative amounts of bound C/EBPb and C/EBPd, with C/EBPb present to a great degree, and C/EBPd present at a smaller, yet recognizable level. The lanes consisting of LPS-activated cell line nuclear extracts with antibodies for either C/EBPa (lane 7) or C/EBP (lane 10) show no decrease in active band intensity relative to extracts incubated without antibody (lane 6). This data suggests that C/EBPa and C/EBP may not take part in the trans-activation of the p40 promoter.




Figure 6. EMSA reveals more precisely the extent of binding of both C/EBPb and C/EBPd to the IL-12 p40 promoter. C/EBPa and C/EBP show no binding to the p40 promoter. An EMSA was performed with 5 µg of nuclear extract from unactivated (lanes 1-5) and LPS-activated (lanes 6-10) cells. Extract and 2 µg of poly(dI-dC) were incubated for 30 min at room temperature without (lanes 1 and 6) or with 2 µl of the following polyclonal antibodies: anti-C/EBPa (lanes 2 and 7), laboratory-prepared anti-C/EBPb (lanes 3 and 8), anti-C/EBPd (lanes 4 and 9), and anti-C/EBP (lanes 5 and 10). After incubation, labeled probe -110/-69 was added and incubation continued for 45 min at room temperature prior to electrophoresis.



In the murine macrophage cell line J774, active C/EBPb is induced between 2 and 4 hours after LPSactivation.

An immunoblot assay was performed using J774 cell line nuclear extracts probed with anti-C/EBPb antibody for increasing periods of time following LPS activation (Fig. 7A). Results show basal levels of C/EBPb in unactivated nuclear extracts. These levels remain constant until the period between 2 and 4 hours after LPS activation, at which point the initial induction of C/EBPb occurs. By 8 hours after LPS activation, protein concentration reaches maximum levels and is maintained into 24 hours. Previous studies have shown that C/EBPb is able to activate the IL-12 p40 promoter within 1 hour of LPS activation (9). The requirement of at least 2 hours for the upregulation of C/EBPb excludes the possibility that an increase in protein concentration is necessary for initial p40 activation. These results suggest some other mechanism of initial C/EBPb activation, such as a post-translational modification of proteins present in the cell. An upregulation of C/EBPb may, however, be necessary to maintain activation of the IL-12 p40 promoter beyond 2 hours of LPS activation.



Figure 7. Immunoblot assays demonstrate the LPS-induced upregulation of C/EBPb in both the J774 murine macrophage cell line and in primary cells. (A) An immunoblot assay was performed with nuclear extracts from J774 cells activated for increasing periods of time with lipopolysaccharide (5 µg/ml). 5 µg of extract was hybridized at room temperature with anti-C/EBPb antibody for 1 h, and then with secondary antibody for 1 h. The hybridization complexes were treated with ECL reaction for 1 min, and were exposed to film. (B) A similar immunblot assay using primary cells as the source of nuclear extract.


In primary cells, induction of active C/EBPb occurs between 4 and 8 hours after LPS activation

Consistent with results obtained in the J774 cell line, primary cell C/EBPb is present at basal levels in the unactivated nucleus and is induced to a constant maximum level following LPS activation (Fig. 7B). In primary cells, the initial induction occurs between 4 and 8 hours and continues into 16 hours, at which point net protein production ceases. Protein levels are maintained into 24 hours.

Discussion

A functional analysis of the murine IL-12 p40 promoter has been carried out, providing information contributing to our understanding of the molecular proceedings that generate a Th1 immune response. In nuclear extracts, DNA-binding activities involving C/EBPb were induced by LPS. C/EBPd DNA-binding activities were induced somewhat less. A heterodimer of the alternatively transcribed forms of C/EBPb, LAP and LIP, has been implicated to provide most of the DNA binding activity in vivo. Finally, C/EBPb (LAP) has been shown to be a transcription activator, while C/EBPb (LIP) has inhibitory effects.

C/EBPb has been shown in previous studies to be induced in monocytes and macrophages (22, 30) and has been suggested to take part in the activation of the genes for cytokines expressed in myeloid cells, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and monocyte inflammatory protein 1a (MIP-1a) (4, 11, 12, 16, 20, 27). Potential mechanisms for the regulation of C/EBPb activity have been suggested, although conclusive determination is yet to be established (3, 9). In one study, mice with a disrupted C/EBPb gene demonstrated decreased IL-12 production and increased susceptibility to infection with intracellular organisms, implicating an IL-12 regulation function to C/EBPb (24). In another study, mice with a disrupted C/EBPb gene were also susceptible to infection but did not show a decrease in IL-12 production, suggesting that other control elements, perhaps C/EBPd, may compensate for the non-functional C/EBPb (28).

In summary, this study provides characterization of IL-12 p40 gene expression with respect to trans-acting control elements. IL-12 p40 expression is a crucial event in the development of a protective immune response to intracellular pathogens, and the dysfunctional regulation of this expression may cause for the Th1 response in chronic inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. The elucidation of IL-12 regulatory mechanisms will provide information about the pathogenesis of infectious and autoimmune diseases and may suggest novel methods for manipulating the immune response.


References

1. Abbas, A. K., K. M. Murphy, and A. Sher. (1996) "Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes" Nature 383:787-793

2. Afonso, L. C., T. M. Sharton, L. W. Vieira, M. Wysocka, G. Trinchieri, and P. Scott. (1994) "The adjuvant effect of interleukin-12 in a vaccine against Leishmania major" Science 263:235-237

3. An, M. R., C.-C. Hsieh, P. D. Reisner, J. P. Rabek, S. G. Scott, D. T. Kuninger, and J. Papaconstantinou. (1996) "Evidence for posttranscriptional regulation of C/EBPa and C/EBPb isoform expression during the lipopolysaccharide-mediated acute-phase response." Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2295-2306

4. Cao, Z. D., R. M. Umek, and S. L. McKnight. (1991) "Regulated expression of 3 C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells" Genes Dev. 5:1538-1552

5. Chehimi, J., S. E. Starr, I. Fank, A. D'Adrea, X. Ma, R. R. MacGregor, J. Sennelier, and G. Trinchieri. (1994) "Impaired interleukin 12 production in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients" J. Exp. Med. 179:1361-1366

6. Chougnet, C., T. A. Wynn, M. Clerici, A. L. Landay, H. A. Kessler, J. Rusnak, G. P. Melcher, A. Sher, and G. M. Shearer. (1996) "Molecular analysis of decreased interleukin-12 production in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus" J. Infect. Dis. 174:46-53

7. Clerici, M., D. R. Lucey, J. A. Berzofsky, L. A. Pinto, T. A. Wynn, S. P. Blatt, M. J. Dolan, C. W. Hendrix, S. F. Wolf and G. M. Shearer. (1993) "Restoration of HIV-specific cell-mediated immune responses by interleukin-12 in vitro" Science 262:1721-1724

8. D'Andrea, A., M. Rengaraju, N. M. Valiante, J. Chehimi, M. Kubin, M. Aste, S. H. Chan, M. Kobayashi, D. Young, E. Nickbarg, et al. (1992) "Production of natural killer cell stimulatory factor (interleukin 12) by peripheral blood mononuclear cells" J. Exp. Med. 176:1387-1398

9. Descombes, P., and U. Schibler. (1991) "A liver-enriched transcriptional activator protein, Lap, and a transcriptional inhibitory protein, Lip, are translated from the same messenger RNA" Cell 67:569-579

10. Dignam, J.E., R.M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder. (1983) "Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei" Nucleic Acids Res. 11:1475-1489

11. Godambe, S. A., D. D. Chaplin, T. Takova, and C. J. Bellone. (1994) "An NFIL-6 sequence near the transcriptional initiation site is necessary for the lipopolysaccharide induction of murine interleukin-1b " DNA Cell Biol. 13:561-569

12. Grove, M., and M. Plumb. (1993) "C/EBP, NF-kB, and C-Ets family members and transcriptional regulation of the cell-specific and inducible macrophage inflammatory protein 1a immediate-early gene" Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:5276-5289

13. Gubler, U., A. O, Chua, D. S. Schoenhaut, C. M. Dwyer, W. McComas, R. Motyka, N. Nabavi, A. G. Wolitzky, P. M. Quinn, P. C. Familletti, and M. K. Gately. (1991) "Coexpression of two distinct genes is required to generate secreted bioactive cytotoxic lymphocyte maturation factor" Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4143-4147

14. Lo, K., N. R. Landau, and S. T. Smale (1991) "Lyf-1, a transcriptional regulator that interacts with a novel class of promoters for lymphocyte-specific genes" Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:5229-5243

15. Ma, X., J. M. Chow, G. Gri, G. Carra, F. Gerosa, S. F. Wolf, R. Dzialo, and G. Trinchieri. (1996) "The interleukin 12 p40 gene promoter is primed by interferon gamma in monocytic cells" J. Exp. Med. 183:147-157

16. Matsusuaka, T., K. Fujikawa, Y. Nishio, N. Mucaida, K. Matsushima, T. Kishimoto, and S. Akira. (1993) "Transcription factors NF-IL6 and NF-kB synergistically activate transcription of the inflammatory cytokines, interleukin 6 and interleukin 8" Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10193-10197

17. Mossman, T. R., and R. L. Coffman. (1989) "TH1 and TH2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties" Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7:145-173

18. Murphy, T. L., M. G. Cleveland, P. Kulesza, J. Magram, and K. M. Murphy. (1995) "Regulation of interleukin 12 p40 expression through an NF-kB half-site" Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:5258-5267

19. Pirmez, C., M. Yamamura, K. Uyemura, M. Paes-Oliveira, F. Conceicao-Silva, and R. L. Modlin. (1993) "Cytokine patterns in the pathogenesis of human leishmaniasis" J. Clin. Invest. 91:1390-1395

20. Pope, R. M., A. Leutz, and S. A. Ness. (1994) "C/EBPb regulation of the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene" J. Clin. Invest. 94:1449-1455

21. Schoenhaut, D. S., A O. Chua, A. G. Wolitzky, P. M. Quinn, C. M. Dwyer, W. McComas, P. C. Familletti, M. K. Gately, and U. Gubler. (1992) "Cloning and expression of murine IL-12" J. Immunol. 148:3433-3440

22. Scott, L. M., C. I. Civin, P. Rorth, and A. D. Friedman. (1992) "A novel temporal expression pattern of three C/EBP family members in differentiating myelomonocytic cells" Blood 80:1725-1735

23. Screpanti, I., L. Romani, P. Musiani, A. Modesti, E. Fattori, D. Lazzaro, C. Sellitto, S. Scarpa, D. Bellavia, G. Lattanzio, et al. (1995) "Lymphoproliferative disorder and imbalanced T-helper response in C/EBPb -deficient mice" EMBO J. 14:1932-1941

24. Seder, R. A., B. L. Kelsall, and D. Jankovic. (1996) "Differential roles for IL-12 in the maintenance of immune responses in infectious versus autoimmune disease" J. Immunol. 157:2745-2748

25. Sieling, P. A., and R. L. Modlin. (1994) "Cytokine patterns at the site of mycobacterial infection" Immunobiology 191:378-387

26. Stacey, K. J., I. L. Ross, and D. A. Hume. (1993) "Electroporation and DNA-dependent cell death in murine macrophages" Immunol. Cell Biol. 71:75-85

27. Stein, B., and A. S. Baldwin, Jr. (1993) "Distinct mechanisms for regulation of the interleukin-8 gene involve synergism and cooperativity between C/EBP and NF-kB" Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:7191-7198

28. Tanaka, T., S. Akira, K. Yoshida, M. Umemoto, Y. Yoneda, N. Shirafuji, H. Fujiwara, S. Suiematsu, N. Yoshida, and T. Kishimoto. (1995) "Targeted disruption of the NF-IL6 gene discloses its essential role in bacteria killing and tumor cytotoxicity by macrophages" Cell 80:353-361

29. Trinchieri, G. (1995) "Interleukin-12: a proinflammatory cytokine with immunoregulatory functions that bridge innate resistance and antigen-specific adaptive immunity" Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:251-276

30. Wedel, A., and H. W. Ziegler-Heitbrock. (1995) "The C/EBP family of transcription factors" Immunobiology 193:171-185

31. Wolf, S. F., P. A. Temple, M. Kobayashi, D. Young, M. Dicig, L. Lowe, R. Dzialo, L. Fitz, C. Ferenz, R. M. Hewick, K. Kelleher, S. H. Herrmann, S. C. Clark, L. Azzoni, S. H. Chan, G. Trinchieri, and B. Perussia. (1991) "Cloning of cDNA for natural killer cell stimulatory factor, a heterodimeric cytokine with multiple biologic effects on T and natural killer cells" J. Immunol. 146:3074-3081

32. Zhang, M., M. K. Gately, E. Wang, J. Gong, S. F. Wolf, S. Lu, R. L. Modline, and P. F. Barnes. (1994) "Interleukin 12 at the site of disease in tuberculosis" J. Clin. Invest. 93:1733-1739

Journal of Young Investigators. 2001. Volume Three.
Copyright © 2001 by Steven E. Zaki and JYI. All rights reserved.
 
SEARCH   |   SITE MAP   |   RECENT WEB SITE ADDITIONS          PRIVACY POLICY  |    CONTACT US

JYI is supported by: The National Science Foundation, The Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Science Magazine, Science's Next Wave, Swarthmore College, Duke University, Georgetown University, and many others.
Copyright ©1998-2003 The Journal of Young Investigators, Inc.