|
|
Issue 1, June 1999
Alaskan Sea Otters and Toxic Algae Blooms: Researching Marine Predator-Prey Interactions
Mary Patyten
Earth Systems Science, CSU Monterey Bay
patyten@jyi.org
This
summer, Mary is studying the behavior of high-level predators in
the presence of algal toxins under Rikk Kvitek, of CSU Monterey
Bay. We asked her to tell us about her experiences. In this feature,
Mary outlines the background of her research.
To the best of our knowledge, marine mammals rarely die from ingesting
the algal
toxins that cause paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) in humans, even though the animals appear
to be physiologically just as susceptible to the toxins as we are.
How do marine mammals, such as sea otters, detect and avoid the
toxins which seasonally accumulate in their prey?
 |
|
Figure
1:
Sea otters, Enhydra lutris, in the wild.
(Photograph by Ed Bowlby)
Photo Gallery |
Rikk Kvitek, a zoologist and researcher interested in how high-level
predators react to algal toxins sequestered in prey items, has been
involved in a long-term quest to answer these and related questions.
In 1988, Kvitek conducted research to determine how captive sea otters
(Enhydra
lutris) would respond to toxic butter
clams (Saxidomus giganteus), a favorite prey of otters
in the wild. Butter clams can concentrate high levels of PSP
toxin in their tissues, especially in the siphon area.
Rikk first gave the otters non-toxic clams, followed by toxic clams.
Behavioral changes were swift and significant when the otters were
presented with the toxic clams. They ate less, often discarding the
toxic siphons or the entire cracked clam. Did otters in the wild behave
similarly? And more to the point, would the presence of toxic clams
affect the distribution of the animals' recovering population?
The sea otter was hunted to extinction in southeast Alaska by fur
traders in the 18th and 19th centuries. In the mid-1960's, 402 otters
from the northern reaches of Alaska were re-introduced to their southern
habitat, and by 1987 the population there had grown to about 3,500
animals. Kvitek was one of the first researchers in the late 1980's
to record the expanding population. This rapid expansion, and the
pervasive presence of toxic butter
clams throughout southeast Alaska, provided Kvitek with
the perfect opportunity to set up a comprehensive study . Through
observation of the animals, collection of discarded sea otter prey,
and sampling prey in areas yet uninhabited by otters, Kvitek hoped
to determine whether the foraging behavior and distribution of sea
otters under natural conditions was mediated by clam toxicity. Did
seasonal toxic
algal blooms determine when and where sea otters settled
and foraged?
Kvitek applied for and received a National Science Foundation (NSF)
grant (award
9726263) to fund the study. The grant paid for cruise time
aboard the R/V
Alpha Helix, a 133' research vessel based in Seward and
run by the University of Alaska for the NSF. Kvitek and a team of
researchers planned two cruises aboard the Helix to observe the animals
in their natural setting. The first cruise, conducted during the summer
of 1998, focused on likely sea otter habitat in southeast Alaska during
the last weeks of July and early August.
 |
|
Figure
2:
The R/V Alpha Helix coming into port.
(Photograph by Bill Head)
Photo Gallery |
In addition to gathering fundamental sea otter ecology data, the project
provided an exciting platform for training students in field biology
methods. Ten California
State University, Monterey Bay undergraduate students and
Moss
Landing Marine Laboratories graduate students participated
in the project, recording sea otter foraging behavior and collecting
prey tissue samples. Using spotting scopes and field glasses, the
teams observed and recorded the length of time otters spent underwater
on each foraging dive, their hunting success rates, and the identity
of their prey. After reviewing observations, Rikk and the research
team dove with SCUBA gear to collect samples of otter prey items and
discarded prey. These samples would provide concrete evidence of what
the otters were - or were not - eating. Samples from each site were
shipped to the Alaska
State Department of Environmental Health Shellfish Program
for PSP toxin testing.
 |
|
Figure
3:
Sample of discarded otter prey collected by the research
team.
(Photograph by Carrie Bretz)
Photo Gallery |
One of their most exciting observation days came on their last day
in Sea Otter Sound, as related by Earth
Systems Science & Policy student Kate Thomas.
"As
we were about ready to wrap up our final day of observing from shore,
a sea otter came in very close, and we observed him very definitely
discarding parts. So I radioed the Helix NOT to pick us up ... this
is why we came here, to find out if we would see this behavior!
He [The otter] would nibble a butter clam, then throw it away. Huge
amounts of tissue were being discarded, and its not like an otter
to throw away food."
The discarding
behavior, which Rikk had observed in captive otters, would later be
correlated with high levels of toxin in Sea Otter Sound clams.
 |
|
Figure
4:
Sea otters selectively nibbling on butter clams.
(Photograph by Ed Bowlby)
Photo Gallery |
Preliminary review of sample analysis data shows that otters were
found foraging at sites with relatively non-toxic prey, with the exception
of Sea Otter Sound. Sea otters were almost completely absent from
sites where butter clam toxin levels paralleled or exceeded the toxin
level in Sea Otter Sound clams.
Rikk said the cruise was both productive and great fun. "Watching
the research team coalesce and pull together as they got to know each
other, and realize that they could actually work in the harsh environmental
conditions of Alaska, was rewarding" he said.
This NSF grant also funds a study on the effects of toxic prey on
predatory marine shorebirds, such as black oystercatchers and marbled
godwits in California. California State University, Monterey Bay students
are collecting samples of marine bird prey items such as California
mussels and mole crabs, and videotaping and recording feeding behavior.
According to Rikk,
"We
still do not know the extent to which marine mammals and birds react
to algal toxins in their natural setting, which is why I got the
grant to study it. We now know that [sea] otters may alter their
diet, and are able to detect and avoid ingesting lethal levels of
PSP toxin. We know very little about other harmful algae bloom-related
toxins and marine mammals, although it now looks as though we had
quite a few sea lions die in our area this past spring as a result
of domoic
acid poisoning. This toxin came from blooms of toxic
diatoms that were consumed by anchovies and then eaten by the
sea lions."
Although toxic
algae blooms are often predictable seasonal occurances,
the extent to which they affect the natural selection patterns or
evolution of both predators and prey is not known. Rikk and his fellow
researchers, concerned about the evident global increase in toxic
algae blooms, are continuing to work towards understanding the relationships
between toxic algae, prey and predators.
Rikk Kvitek is currently on his second cruise through
southeast Alaska studying sea otter feeding behavior while working
on myriad other projects and teaching classes in marine science at
CSU Monterey Bay.
Journal
of Young Investigators. 1999. Volume Two.
Copyright © 1999 by Mary Patyten and JYI. All rights reserved.
|
|